Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72498Re: Too Good to be True?
From: Lieutenant 030
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1992 15:20
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1992 15:20
46 lines
2707 bytes
2707 bytes
mib@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Michael I Bushnell) writes: > In article <NB38eB19w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) > So basically, I can completely bypass the GPL so long as the customer has > his own linker? > > You can't put them in the same file. Any changes you make to FSF > source have to be given (and identified as your changes). Any code > you write which is legally derivative has to be under the GPL. You'll > have to pay your lawyer, not ours, but that's the same with anything. > If you don't read the source, you are guaranteed it's not derivative, > so you aren't worse off than with commercial software. This is not > "bypassing" the GPL. Hypothetical scenario: I obtain a copy of GNU Emacs, and set about porting it to some new architecture Foo. I identify all the functions which don't work for some reason on the new architecture, and document what they are supposed to do. I then give the documents to a programmer, who writes a set of proprietary functions performing the appropriate tasks on our new architecture. I modify the "free" GNU Emacs code to make it use external versions of the duff functions, and #ifdef out the duff ones (or just delete them). I distribute this modified non-functional "Emacs library" under the terms of the GPL. I sell my proprietary functions as "Emacs for Foo", supplying a small install program which links them with the "Emacs library" to create an executable. I can even provide the "Emacs library" on the same disk. I now have a port of Emacs to a new architecture. I can sell it and prohibit redistribution. People can demand the "Emacs library" source and can copy it freely, but it in fact is less useful than a plain old copy of GNU Emacs. That's what I mean by "...I can completely bypass the GPL." mathew -- Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices / If you know where I can buy the CD "In Mysterious Ways" by John Foxx, please send me email / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! / My PGP RSA public key is available on request / Desperately seeking CD of "U2" by Negativland / 4 lines
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<F6m0eB8w164w@mantis.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathewReferences:
<MIB.92Jan27201417@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-28 13:38:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <F6m0eB8w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 28 Jan 92 15:20:50 GMT References: <MIB.92Jan27201417@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 46