🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72498

Re: Too Good to be True?

#72498
From: Lieutenant 030
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1992 15:20
46 lines
2707 bytes
mib@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Michael I Bushnell) writes:
> In article <NB38eB19w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) 
>    So basically, I can completely bypass the GPL so long as the customer has
>    his own linker?
> 
> You can't put them in the same file.  Any changes you make to FSF
> source have to be given (and identified as your changes).  Any code
> you write which is legally derivative has to be under the GPL.  You'll
> have to pay your lawyer, not ours, but that's the same with anything.
> If you don't read the source, you are guaranteed it's not derivative,
> so you aren't worse off than with commercial software.  This is not
> "bypassing" the GPL.

Hypothetical scenario:

I obtain a copy of GNU Emacs, and set about porting it to some new
architecture Foo.  I identify all the functions which don't work for some
reason on the new architecture, and document what they are supposed to
do.

I then give the documents to a programmer, who writes a set of proprietary
functions performing the appropriate tasks on our new architecture.

I modify the "free" GNU Emacs code to make it use external versions of
the duff functions, and #ifdef out the duff ones (or just delete them).

I distribute this modified non-functional "Emacs library" under the terms of
the GPL.  I sell my proprietary functions as "Emacs for Foo", supplying
a small install program which links them with the "Emacs library" to create
an executable.  I can even provide the "Emacs library" on the same disk.

I now have a port of Emacs to a new architecture.  I can sell it and
prohibit redistribution.  People can demand the "Emacs library" source and
can copy it freely, but it in fact is less useful than a plain old copy of
GNU Emacs.

That's what I mean by "...I can completely bypass the GPL."


mathew

-- 
Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices / If
you know where I can buy the CD "In Mysterious Ways" by John Foxx, please send
me email / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! / My PGP RSA public key is
available on request / Desperately seeking CD of "U2" by Negativland / 4 lines
Technical Details
Message-ID: <F6m0eB8w164w@mantis.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
References: <MIB.92Jan27201417@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-28 13:38:00 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Too Good to be True?
Message-ID: <F6m0eB8w164w@mantis.co.uk>
Date: 28 Jan 92 15:20:50 GMT
References: <MIB.92Jan27201417@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
Lines: 46