Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72615Re: the difference between software etc. Bonus: an experiment!
From: Scott E. Preece
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1992 05:08
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1992 05:08
50 lines
3366 bytes
3366 bytes
From: holtz@netcord.Eng.Sun.COM (Brian Holtz) | | In article <1090@hertz.sbi.com> ram@hertz.sbi.com (Srinivasan Sriram) writes: | | > Who is in control of dispersing the data. (Like Cable | > TV companies and cable channel producers), will they | > impose a set of guidelines, rules or restrictions on | > how much money and to whom. | | It won't be any of their business. The phone company has no control | over my computer dialing your computer and trading bits. I didn't say | there won't be money in wiring houses for data communications. What I | said is that there won't be money in hoping that people will try | to get copies of your data only from _you_. --- Well, I would guess that a few years down the road computer software (as well as audio and video software) will be mostly pay-per-use. Once the distribution technology is to the point that you can handle the volume, it makes a lot more sense for both buyers and sellers. I've got a lot of records (and programs) that I would have saved a lot on if I had paid a lower price for one or two uses. And I'd guess publishers will use encryption and interactive license managers to enforce the charging scheme. --- | | > I think publishing houses will abound, who will directly | > or indirectly influence the nature and cost of data/ | > instructions dispersed to the consumer. | | It's trivial to influence the circumstances surrounding the first time | your data are received by a consumer. The problem lies in influencing | the 2nd through nth times that your data are so received. --- If you assume the consumer is always in contact with the vendor, it should be straightforward to verify (and bill for) each use of a software object. We already have publishers giving out free copies of their software that can be activated by obtaining a license over the telephone; it's not a big step from that to obtaining a license at each use, once you assume you're always connected. I recommend to those interested in possible futures for information distribution, the SF book "Farewell Horizontal" by KW Jeter, which includes as part of its flavoring a pretty well developed picture of an information industry that we could get to in a relatively short time. -- scott preece motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801 uucp: uunet!uiucuxc!udc!preece, arpa: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PREECE.92Jan20230803@neptune.urbana.mcd.mot.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!apple!motcsd!udc!preeceReferences:
<NELSON.92Jan9232614@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <iViHeB6w164w@mantis.co.uk> <kn6pijINN30j@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1090@hertz.sbi.com> <knc57bINN6qh@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,cf42a4f5e2fb550e X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-20 23:28:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!apple!motcsd!udc!preece From: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com (Scott E. Preece) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: the difference between software etc. Bonus: an experiment! Message-ID: <PREECE.92Jan20230803@neptune.urbana.mcd.mot.com> Date: 21 Jan 92 05:08:14 GMT References: <NELSON.92Jan9232614@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <iViHeB6w164w@mantis.co.uk> <kn6pijINN30j@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1090@hertz.sbi.com> <knc57bINN6qh@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Sender: news@urbana.mcd.mot.com (News) Distribution: gnu Organization: Motorola MCD, Urbana Design Center Lines: 50 In-Reply-To: holtz@netcord.Eng.Sun.COM's message of 16 Jan 92 23:27:39 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: neptune.urbana.mcd.mot.com