Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72658Re: Why HURD and not BSD?
From: pgd
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1992 05:35
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1992 05:35
8 lines
828 bytes
828 bytes
BSD and MACH were considered for GNU HURD. MACH was selected, and BSD rejected. Does anyone know why BSD was rejected? It appears to be the most complete product, after all. -- Per Lindqvist Internet: pgd@compuram.bbt.se Fidonet: Per Lindqvist @ 2:201/332
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jan16.053509.8415@compuram.bbt.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!fauern!unido!mcsun!fuug!news.funet.fi!sunic!seunet!kullmar!compuram!pgdReferences:
<1992Jan15.200129.2725@compuram.bbt.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,3fa7f2968a53caeb,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-16 21:51:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!fauern!unido!mcsun!fuug!news.funet.fi!sunic!seunet!kullmar!compuram!pgd From: pgd@compuram.bbt.se Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Why HURD and not BSD? Message-ID: <1992Jan16.053509.8415@compuram.bbt.se> Date: 16 Jan 92 05:35:09 GMT References: <1992Jan15.200129.2725@compuram.bbt.se> Lines: 8