Re: Emacs vs. vi: # of users?

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #72699

#72699

From: Noah Friedman
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 22:42

4 lines
1093 bytes

In article <1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu> jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz) writes:
>For the sake of the argument of which editor is more "standart", I'd

   `ed' is the standard text editor.  The man page (ed(1)) says so.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <FRIEDMAN.92Jan14174205@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!life.ai.mit.edu!friedman

References: <1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff485,459d66e7bfcdecc7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidff485,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,70095a683cc8572a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-14 15:48:40 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!life.ai.mit.edu!friedman
From: friedman@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,alt.religion.emacs
Subject: Re: Emacs vs. vi: # of users?
Message-ID: <FRIEDMAN.92Jan14174205@nutrimat.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 14 Jan 92 22:42:05 GMT
References: <1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu>
Sender: news@ai.mit.edu
Organization: Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139
Lines: 5
In-reply-to: jbotz@mtholyoke.edu's message of 13 Jan 92 23:21:12 GMT

Reply to Parent Message