Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72733Re: Too Good to be True?
From: Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1992 06:08
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1992 06:08
47 lines
2929 bytes
2929 bytes
mathew@mantis.co.uk (en font terrible) writes: >No, I'm forced to conclude that the only "problem" was that you didn't >get as much as you wanted from the commercial company. Well, sorry, but >forcing companies to give you things doesn't seem to me to be a very >good reason for putting programs under the GPL. From my perspective it is the very best of reasons to put things under the GPL. That's why I have released a program under the GPL--so that people like myself will get what I would want in their place. And again, I posted originally in response to your claim that ``everybody could benefit'' if code were public domain rather than GNU. I remain unconvinced, because I would not benefit. I may be an unusual case, but then you have not persuaded me that the GPL is worse than public domain. >If anything, putting NOS under the GPL would have ensured that the >commercial company wouldn't touch it with a barge pole, since there would >be no profit to be made from selling it -- and the users would have >had no version of NOS, rather than a buggy commercial version. Hardly >a more productive alternative. Not so, because in fact Alpha Micro is distributing my port of gcc to members of their software developer program. Non software developers can get the code, but they don't get access to the bulletin board or to the update notices. Alpha Micro chose to do this when we demonstrated that gcc was vastly superior to their home brew non ANSI C compiler. Incidentally, Alpha Micro is not actually distributing the source, just making it available upon request; I don't think anybody has bothered to request it yet. Alpha Micro is also considering distributing my UUCP package, despite the GNU license. Many people are perfectly content to pay a reasonable fee for the right to call someone up and ask questions. >Yeah, and which would you rather have -- a commercial version of the software, >possibly with bugs, or no version of the software? A third choice. I would settle for a commercial version with source code, but this is very unusual. Your examples of it so far don't carry any more weight with me than my examples do with you. -- Ian Taylor ian@airs.com uunet!airs!ian First person to identify this quote wins a free e-mail message: ``Hagenbeck sent a special expedition to Lake Bangweolo; unfortunately this expedition did not even find the lake.''
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3321@airs.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!airs!ianReferences:
<3313@airs.com> <JoeLeB13w164w@mantis.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-16 08:58:38 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!airs!ian From: ian@airs.com (Ian Lance Taylor) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <3321@airs.com> Date: 16 Jan 92 06:08:48 GMT References: <3313@airs.com> <JoeLeB13w164w@mantis.co.uk> Sender: news@airs.com Lines: 47