Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72763Re: Too Good to be True?
From: Milt Epstein
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1992 21:44
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1992 21:44
30 lines
1954 bytes
1954 bytes
In <0cHceB10w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (en font terrible) writes: >nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) writes: >> In article <iRNaeB6w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (en font terrible) >> I don't use GNU products unless there is no alternative. However, I feel >> obliged to point out that if people who spend their time writing GNU >> software were to spend their time writing free software instead, everyone >> could benefit. >> >> The only people who don't benefit right now are the people who don't want >> to share their software. > >False. Those who want their software to be completely free are also unable >to benefit. Can you elaborate on what you mean by "completely free", and explain why these people do not benefit from the GNU license? You seem to be meaning "completely free" in a sense that includes those who would want to control access to the code they write that includes code contributed by others. That makes the software less "free", since once it is used by those, it will no longer be free. Hence, it seems like it is exactly those who want their software to be completely free that benefit. -- Milt Epstein Department of Computer Science University of Illinois epstein@cs.uiuc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jan10.214425.17129@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!m.cs.uiuc.edu!sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu!sunc2.cs.uiuc.edu!epsteinReferences:
<NELSON.92Jan9233040@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <0cHceB10w164w@mantis.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-10 14:02:12 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!m.cs.uiuc.edu!sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu!sunc2.cs.uiuc.edu!epstein From: epstein@sunc2.cs.uiuc.edu (Milt Epstein) Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <1992Jan10.214425.17129@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu> Sender: news@sunb10.cs.uiuc.edu Reply-To: epstein@cs.uiuc.edu Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign References: <NELSON.92Jan9233040@cheetah.clarkson.edu> <0cHceB10w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1992 21:44:25 GMT