Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72801Re: Too Good to be True?
From: en font terrible
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 11:58
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 11:58
25 lines
1932 bytes
1932 bytes
jbuck@forney.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes: > Just about everyone who's brought out a RISC chip lately has ported > gcc to it; in many cases it's the only compiler available for the chip. > gcc was originally written for the Vax and the 68000; the feedback provided > by the porters, TOGETHER WITH THEIR SOURCE, made it far easier to port gcc > to each additional chip and architecture. Without the GPL, each vendor would > have started with gcc anyway (why not? It's a high quality piece of work > they could get free), but not sent their own sources back to FSF. Result: > lots of people very expensively reinventing the wheel. Instead, gcc has > become easier and easier to port. How, then, do you explain MINIX? It's under a commercial license. Source is made available. Many people have sent patches and improvements to MINIX back to the authors, and they have been included in subsequent releases. The system has become more and more portable; there are now PC, ST, Amiga, and Mac versions, with an Archimedes (RISC) version expected soon. mathew -- Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices / If you know where I can buy the CD "In Mysterious Ways" by John Foxx, please send me email / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! / My PGP RSA public key is available on request / Desperately seeking CD of "U2" by Negativland / 4 lines
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<FsLHeB13w164w@mantis.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathewReferences:
<kmsr60INNsni@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-13 13:19:28 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (en font terrible) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <FsLHeB13w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 13 Jan 92 11:58:38 GMT References: <kmsr60INNsni@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 25