Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72808Emacs vs. vi: # of users?
From: Jurgen Botz
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 23:21
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 23:21
17 lines
1480 bytes
1480 bytes
For the sake of the argument of which editor is more "standart", I'd be interested if anyone has any (even fuzzy) data on how many users of each editor there are. The fact that vi is shipped with (almost?) all Unix systems points to vi, but I suspect that over 90% of all computer science students who work on Unix use emacs, and they must be a pretty sizable percentage of Unix users. Also: _is_ vi shipped with all Unix (and clone) systems? If not, which (other than GNU, which isn't ready, and has a vi-clone anyway) vendors don't ship vi? What percentage of Unix vendors ship emacs? -- Jurgen Botz | Internet: JBotz@mtholyoke.edu Academic Systems Consultant | Bitnet: JBotz@mhc.bitnet Mount Holyoke College | Voice: (US) 413-538-2375 (daytime) South Hadley, MA, USA | Snail Mail: J. Botz, 01075-0629
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!garbo.ucc.umass.edu!orixa.mtholyoke.edu!jbotzShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,70095a683cc8572a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 1569e3,70095a683cc8572a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1569e3,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-13 15:57:36 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,alt.emacs.religion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!garbo.ucc.umass.edu!orixa.mtholyoke.edu!jbotz From: jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz) Subject: Emacs vs. vi: # of users? Message-ID: <1992Jan13.232112.12150@mtholyoke.edu> Organization: Mount Holyoke College Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1992 23:21:12 GMT