Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72841Re: GP Library Licence Question
From: Paul D. Smith
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1992 16:13
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1992 16:13
54 lines
3460 bytes
3460 bytes
[] Regarding Re: GP Library Licence Question;
[] david@wubios.wustl.edu (David J. Camp) writes:
djc> In Reply to this Note From: <Steve Simmons>
djc> [text deleted]
> [you must] accompany the work [that uses the library] with the
> complete corresponding machine-readable source code for the
> Library including whatever changes were used in the work . . .
> and, if the work is an executable linked with the Library,
> with the complete machine-readable "work that uses the
> Library", as object code and/or source code, so that the user
> can modify the Library and then relink to produce a modified
> executable containing the modified Library."
>Note it explicitly says one must either distribute (a) source or
>(b) source and object. This is source and object for the work,
>not just for the library.
djc> You must ship the source for the library. You must ship the
djc> source OR object for the work that uses the library. The
djc> term and/or is interpreted by logicians as an inclusive or,
djc> which makes the "and" redundant except to distinguish it from
djc> an exclusive or.
Please note that the actual text of Section 6 allows you to choose
*one of* a number of different options, of which the quoted option is
just the first. Of particular interest here, I would think, are the
second and third options, which state:
b) Accompany the work with a written offer, valid for at
least three years, to give the same user the materials
specified in Subsection 6a, above, for a charge no more
than the cost of performing this distribution.
c) If distribution of the work is made by offering access to copy
from a designated place, offer equivalent access to copy the above
specified materials from the same place.
So you don't even have to ship the object code and/or source code with
the work, you just have to make sure customers understand that they
may obtain it at a reasonable distribution fee (part b) or via anon
ftp or something similar (part c). Very likely 90% of customers won't
ever bother you for it...
--
paul
-----
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul D. Smith | paul_smith@dg.com |
| Data General Corp. | pds@lemming.webo.dg.com |
| Network Systems Development Division | |
| Open Network Systems Development | "Pretty Damn S..." |
------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PDS.92Jan3111354@lemming.webo.dg.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dg-rtp!webo!dg-webo!pdsReferences:
<1991Dec31.200952.19634@lokkur.dexter.mi.us> <9112312203.AA20158@wubios>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,566b8b971322213d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-03 10:04:42 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dg-rtp!webo!dg-webo!pds From: pds@lemming.webo.dg.com (Paul D. Smith) Subject: Re: GP Library Licence Question Sender: usenet@webo.dg.com (Usenet Administration) Message-ID: <PDS.92Jan3111354@lemming.webo.dg.com> In-Reply-To: david@wubios.wustl.edu's message of Tue, 31 Dec 1991 22:03:06 GMT Date: 03 Jan 92 16:13:54 GMT Distribution: gnu Lines: 54 References: <1991Dec31.200952.19634@lokkur.dexter.mi.us> <9112312203.AA20158@wubios> Organization: NSDD/ONSD, Data General Corp., Westboro, MA Lines: 54