Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72935Re: Boycotts and fairness
From: Adam J Richter
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1991 05:46
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1991 05:46
42 lines
2973 bytes
2973 bytes
In article <1991Nov17.151222.21312@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> huntley@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (Haydn Huntley) writes: >In the past, I have argued that the FSF is unfair in punishing Apple, >but not punishing other companies. Some of the other companies are >Xerox (which sued Apple, but isn't usually mentioned on the boycott >list), and AT&T which claims to own the concept of 'backing store' and >which is threatening users of X Windows. Actually, the LPF is boycotting Xerox. As for AT&T, the LPF has not officially declared a boycott, but the LPF does ask that everyone who decides not to make some purchase from AT&T as a result of AT&T's legal threats send mail to league@prep.ai.mit.edu. In the mean time, AT&T has asked the patent office to reexamine their "backing store" patent. >Also, IBM, DEC, MIPS, Xerox >and AT&T are filing algorithm patents as fast as they can, and >algorithm patents are much more pernicious than user interface >copyrights, yet the FSF does *nothing* to discourage these companies >from patenting everything in sight! The LPF is opposed to software patents. In fact, one of our two position papers, _Against Software Patents_, is dedicated entirely to this subject. We've just finished a letter writing campaign in response to the 5/16/91 "Request for comments for the Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform." It is my understanding that there will be an LPF contingent on hand to protest Rob Pike's talk at MIT a few days from now (according to message that I received about this event, Pike publicly advocates software patents). If the LPF were to target specific companies in some action against software patents, I suspect that we'd want to single out some of the worst offenders (such as companies that are trying to change the interpretation of the law to be more restrictive, as is the case with Lotus and Apple in UI copyrights). Because there are so many companies filing for software patents, and because some people claim that such activities need to be done for the purpose of defense from other patent infringement lawsuits, the worst offenders would be companies that do more than just file for patents. Adam J. Richter adam@soda.berkeley.edu 409 Evelyn Avenue, Apt. 312 ....!ucbvax!soda!adam Albany, CA 94706 (510)528-3209
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<kiekt4INNjab@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!soda.berkeley.edu!adamReferences:
<9111162058.AA24432@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1991Nov17.151222.21312@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,588d18222ac4bc3c X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-11-18 04:22:13 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!soda.berkeley.edu!adam From: adam@soda.berkeley.edu (Adam J Richter) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Boycotts and fairness Message-ID: <kiekt4INNjab@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 18 Nov 91 05:46:12 GMT References: <9111162058.AA24432@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1991Nov17.151222.21312@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> Distribution: gnu Organization: cc Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu