Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73108Re: Copyleft & royalties for authors
From: Jyrki Kuoppala
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1991 22:28
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1991 22:28
41 lines
3086 bytes
3086 bytes
In article <6NOV199102451712@minnie.me.udel.edu>, johnston@minnie (Bill Johnston) writes: >>I could just put it in the public domain, but I can forsee the >>possibility of some unpleasentness. What if some software company out >>there uses my code in a program that they sell commercially? > >But why is this so bad? The code you wrote is still available for free. I of course can't speak for the original poster, but if I think myself in a similar situation I would think it's very unfair for the company to put limits on the distribution of my program - they may add a couple of features, or just change the copyright to their own and then they can just ship the binary and take away the freedom of users to have third-party improvements to the code and to share it with their friends and others. I personally don't see anything wrong with someone making money from my ideas - well, if they make a few million $$ and I'll end up starving, then I'll perhaps feel a bit silly because I didn't make the million $$, but such is life. But when someone takes my ideas or work which I've made for everybody to use, adds a few insignificant details and then starts to restrict the availablity of the ideas to others, then I feel insulted and harmed since my ideas and work have been turned into something very non-productive and very harmful to the idea of sharing of tools, information and ideas. Other people have reasons for putting their work in the public domain, and that's OK with me - I don't want to take their right to do that away, and I hope they are not trying to take my right of using the GPL away. Still others make their living at selling copyrighted software - I don't want to take away their right to do that, and many of them don't want to take away others' right to write public domain or GPL'd software; many of them even benefit a lot from public domain and GPL'd software (I'm told that for example Lotus uses gcc). However, it seems that software patents and interface copyrights might make both good public domain and good GPL'd software quite impossible in practice, and I certainly feel that this is very unacceptable. //Jyrki
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Nov6.222801.13486@nntp.hut.fi>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!zeus.ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!wupost!uunet!mcsun!fuug!nntp.hut.fi!usenetReferences:
<1991Nov3.233743.29063@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1991Nov04.171025.23022@infoserver.th-darmstadt.de> <1991Nov5.210739.19151@iitmax.iit.edu> <6NOV199102451712@minnie.me.udel.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,246c9c7ef4135c55 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-11-06 15:12:53 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!zeus.ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!wupost!uunet!mcsun!fuug!nntp.hut.fi!usenet From: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Copyleft & royalties for authors Message-ID: <1991Nov6.222801.13486@nntp.hut.fi> Date: 6 Nov 91 22:28:01 GMT References: <1991Nov3.233743.29063@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <1991Nov04.171025.23022@infoserver.th-darmstadt.de> <1991Nov5.210739.19151@iitmax.iit.edu> <6NOV199102451712@minnie.me.udel.edu> Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id) Reply-To: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala) Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Lines: 41 In-Reply-To: johnston@minnie.me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston) Nntp-Posting-Host: sauna.cs.hut.fi