Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73266Re: A/UX comments wanted
From: Scott W. Haney
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1991 23:10
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1991 23:10
47 lines
3168 bytes
3168 bytes
adam@soda.berkeley.edu (Adam J Richter) writes: >In article <5075@stl.stc.co.uk> "Andrew G. Minter" <agm@stl.stc.co.uk> writes: >>However, when advising others, I consider that I >>have a duty to be objective. This means that while I may explain my >>concerns about Apple's policies I would not go out of my way to dig up dirt >>about the companies products > Going out of your way to dig up dirt about a company's >products makes your opinion more objective, not less objective, since >your new opinion would be based more on facts and less on gut feeling. >You have no obligation to stop yourself from learning about the >deficiencies of Apple's products. I don't think that is what Mr. Minter was saying. The original request made by arnej@lise.unit.no FIRST asked for ancedotal dirt on A/UX and then, almost as an afterthought it appeared, for comparisons between A/UX and other UNIXes. It seemed to me that the poster wanted some stuff with which to screw up Apple demonstrations at the university. Education of people about Apple's computers or corporate policies did not appear to be goal. Wouldn't passing around leaflets containing (1) objective technical comparisons between Apples and other machines and (2) a statement of the rationale for the GNU boycott be better than lobbing anonymous cheap-shots at Apple salespeople? This is above-board and honest. > Also, you have no obligation to provide people with helpful >information about the Macintosh any more than a chemistry student >should feel obligated to sell terrorists on nerve gas. You need not >point out opportunities for people to gain by doing things that have >a negative tota effect, like producing nerve gas or buying from Apple. To compare Apple's business practices with terrorists producing nerve gas is absolutely outrageous. Please get some perspective. In addition, don't the means that arnej@lise.unit.no proposes for influencing people at the university bother you? Or is it "the means justifies the ends" when talking about Apple? >Adam J. Richter adam@soda.berkeley.edu >409 Evelyn Avenue, Apt. 312 ....!ucbvax!soda!adam >Albany, CA 94706 (510)528-3209 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott W. Haney || Lawrence Livermore N'Lab || The above views are haney@random.llnl.gov || P.O. Box 808; L-644 || mine and not neces- (415) 423-6308 || Livermore, CA 94550 || sarily LLNL's.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<haney.688605042@moonshine>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!zeus.ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!mips!pacbell.com!lll-winken!moonshine!haneyReferences:
<1991Oct24.021415.6592@ugle.unit.no> <5075@stl.stc.co.uk> <1991Oct27.195110.146@agate.berkeley.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,6535890f8096f45d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-10-27 16:06:35 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!zeus.ieee.org!sdd.hp.com!mips!pacbell.com!lll-winken!moonshine!haney From: haney@moonshine.llnl.gov (Scott W. Haney) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: A/UX comments wanted Keywords: a/ux,apple,macintosh Message-ID: <haney.688605042@moonshine> Date: 27 Oct 91 23:10:42 GMT References: <1991Oct24.021415.6592@ugle.unit.no> <5075@stl.stc.co.uk> <1991Oct27.195110.146@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV Lines: 47 Nntp-Posting-Host: moonshine.llnl.gov