Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73425Re: Date of first ____
From: David J. Camp
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1991 20:04
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1991 20:04
52 lines
3012 bytes
3012 bytes
In Reply to this Note From: <Ignatios Souvatzis> > >In article <1991Sep15.035718.14969@uwm.edu> anthony@convex.csd.uwm.edu >(Anthony J Stieber) writes: > > In article <1991Sep3.192636.18963@leland.Stanford.EDU> > alderson@Alderson.Stanford.EDU (Rich Alderson) writes: > > >DECSYSTEM-20 (PDP-10 model KL-10)/Macro-20 assembler/Tops-20. > >Mark Crispin had already shown several versions for the > >architecture. > > >I REALLY miss that machine! > > Write an emulator then :). If you do it in Lisp, then you can run > it under GNU Emacs, and run Emacs in TECO under TOPS-20 on a PDP-10 > under GNU Emacs under unix. > > Just make sure to forget it was me who ever suggested it be done :). > -- > <-:(= Anthony Stieber anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu uwm!uwmcsd4!anthony > >Err... And I just was wondering if anybody has constructed a plug-in >byte-code coprocessor for the MIPS chips. Maybe the people mentioned >some months ago constructing pdp-8's out of modern chipsets could >build one? The OSF has been wanting to make a shrink-wrapped software capability. They have been using a threaded code concept with some post-compilation required during installation. That would allow vendors to hide their source code, but still release the software in a format common to all machines. I say, why reinvent a processor for threaded code? Simply use one of the existing RISC architectures (I vote for Sparc) as the intermediate language, and compile for that architecture. Provide emulators for other architectures. I suppose that would be an unfair advantage to the Sparc people, but other groups could provide competing emulators. Are a multiplicity of hardware architectures a good thing? Technically, they are not, but from a market perspective they are. By allowing a variety of codesets to compete for your hardware dollar, they prevent any one group (i.e. patent holder) from dominating the market. I suppose that negates my suggestion of using the Sparc for an intermediate codeset, but it is for market reasons, not technical reasons. -David- # david@wubios.wustl.edu ^ David J. Camp # # david%wubios@wugate.wustl.edu < * > +1 314 382 0584 # # ...!uunet!wugate!wubios!david v "God loves material things." #
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9109202004.AA12356@wubios>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!ira.uka.de!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!davidReferences:
<U502SOU.91Sep19133357@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5074954464e2614a X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-09-21 12:52:31 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!ira.uka.de!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!david From: david@wubios.wustl.edu (David J. Camp) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Date of first ____ Message-ID: <9109202004.AA12356@wubios> Date: 20 Sep 91 20:04:22 GMT References: <U502SOU.91Sep19133357@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 52