Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73622Re: GNU view of TeX Users Group (TUG): "information hoarders"?
From: Steven Smith
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1991 18:16
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1991 18:16
40 lines
3079 bytes
3079 bytes
In article <1991Jul28Su232915.Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM> Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM writes: > As the GNU project uses TeX in its several TeXinfo-written manuals > (e.g., the GNU Emacs Manual), I am curious how a GNU Project/Free > Software Foundation viewpoint would see the TeX Users Group (TUG). I > know TUG does important work in charting the future path of TeX, etc. > On the other hand one must pay a membership fee in order to access, > say, their TUGBoat publication. One couldn't just FTP it and print it > out. Would TUG be seen as "information hoarders"? > > [Perhaps this is a little different than the TeX and LaTeX books, as > they have already been copyrighted years ago by their publishers, I > presume, and could not as easily be legally, say, put under anonymous > FTP next month.] This question touches upon upon something I am curious about: Has Knuth ever made public his motivations for freely distributing TeX and METAFONT? Aside from his evident altruistic considerations, were there constraints imposed upon bringing TeX to the market by granting agencies or the AMS? (Is this any of my business? No, but I _am_ curious.) It appears that this was a shrewd decision. TeX is the standard or preferred medium for many academic journals. It's power, quality, and price have made it ubiquitous in the demanding and penurious academic/research environment. This ubiquity must have fostered not-insignificant sales of The TeXbook. Would TeX have achieved these disparate accomplishments if it were originally offered for sale at some unknown market price? Mathematica, whose course seems to have been modeled after that of TeX's (major software tool targeted at the researcher community, a big Addison-Wesley book of instructions typeset in TeX, a users group with its own journal), has been quite successful. So far as I know, Mathematica is not a research project in symbolic algebra the way that TeX is in digital typography, but a comparison between these two software products is illuminating. It will be interesting follow the longevity of software like GNU Emacs and TeX versus that of, say, Mathematica. Steven Smith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SMITH.91Jul31141652@michael.harvard.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!olivea!bu.edu!spdcc!hsdndev!husc6!husc6.harvard.edu!smithReferences:
<1991Jul28Su232915.Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9e16,e000dc74a809d597 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e16,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e000dc74a809d597 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-31 16:12:48 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!olivea!bu.edu!spdcc!hsdndev!husc6!husc6.harvard.edu!smith From: smith@michael.harvard.edu (Steven Smith) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.text.tex Subject: Re: GNU view of TeX Users Group (TUG): "information hoarders"? Message-ID: <SMITH.91Jul31141652@michael.harvard.edu> Date: 31 Jul 91 18:16:52 GMT References: <1991Jul28Su232915.Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM> Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.text.tex Organization: Harvard Robotics Lab, Harvard University Lines: 40 In-reply-to: Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM's message of 29 Jul 91 03:29:21 GMT