🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73685

Re: Richard Stallman's Most Obnoxious

#73685
From: David J. Camp
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1991 06:38
72 lines
2955 bytes
In Reply to this Note From: <carlton@husc.harvard.edu>
>
>>>   From: david@wubios.wustl.EDU (David J. Camp)
>>>
>>>   Bright-eyes and pretty Nina Lytton of the "Open Systems Advisor" says:
>
>> I insist that my remark was in no way sexist.
>
>Really.

Yes.

>
>> I in no way indicated
>> that this woman should be dominated by a man or men.
>
>So?

The definition of sexist that I am familiar with is "The intention for
one sex to dominate another."

>
>> I have known
>> women who lose understanding due to their dependance on their vanity.
>
>Again, so?  This has nothing to do with anything else you are saying.

Perhaps I need to be disputed on this point.  Do women place a higher
priority on vanity than men?

>
>> Her comment showed incredible lack of insight into the market, saying
>> that a vaporware product of a shrinking proprietary systems market
>> would make the burgeoning open systems market obsolete by a minor
>> and greatly over-reported negotiation by two vendors who are losing
>> market share.
>
>See above.

See what above?  All I saw were some terse denials without any
demonstration of intelligence.

>
>> Please look up the word sexism in a reasonably un-contemporized
>> dictionary before you practice libel about another individuals
>> conduct.  -David-
>
>Libel?  Get a clue, man.  Are you seriously claiming that men are as
>likely to be addressed in terms such as "bright-eyes and pretty"?
>That, underlying that, isn't a culture which tries to reduce women to
>objects of attraction instead of thinking people?  You seemed to be
>implying that attractive people were somehow less intelligent,
>certainly.

The statement that I made a sexist remark was what I considered
erroneous.

Do you know of any women that are offended with a comment like
"bright-eyed and pretty?"  Is it an attempt to dominate the recipient?
Was it based on her gender?  Was it incorrect?

I find women very attractive.  That I express it gives me no shame.

>
>david carlton
>carlton@husc.harvard.edu
>

# david@wubios.wustl.edu             ^     David J. Camp                #
# david%wubios@wugate.wustl.edu    < * >   +1 314 382 0584              #
# ...!uunet!wugate!wubios!david      v     "God Bless Terra."           #
#    "The Truth will set you free.  ---  Power to the People!           #
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9107300638.AA11696@wubios>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!david
References: <9107300305.AA15415@husc8>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,6abc03471515819f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-30 03:43:58 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!david
From: david@wubios.wustl.edu (David J. Camp)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Richard Stallman's Most Obnoxious
Message-ID: <9107300638.AA11696@wubios>
Date: 30 Jul 91 06:38:07 GMT
References: <9107300305.AA15415@husc8>
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 72