Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73685Re: Richard Stallman's Most Obnoxious
From: David J. Camp
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1991 06:38
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1991 06:38
72 lines
2955 bytes
2955 bytes
In Reply to this Note From: <carlton@husc.harvard.edu> > >>> From: david@wubios.wustl.EDU (David J. Camp) >>> >>> Bright-eyes and pretty Nina Lytton of the "Open Systems Advisor" says: > >> I insist that my remark was in no way sexist. > >Really. Yes. > >> I in no way indicated >> that this woman should be dominated by a man or men. > >So? The definition of sexist that I am familiar with is "The intention for one sex to dominate another." > >> I have known >> women who lose understanding due to their dependance on their vanity. > >Again, so? This has nothing to do with anything else you are saying. Perhaps I need to be disputed on this point. Do women place a higher priority on vanity than men? > >> Her comment showed incredible lack of insight into the market, saying >> that a vaporware product of a shrinking proprietary systems market >> would make the burgeoning open systems market obsolete by a minor >> and greatly over-reported negotiation by two vendors who are losing >> market share. > >See above. See what above? All I saw were some terse denials without any demonstration of intelligence. > >> Please look up the word sexism in a reasonably un-contemporized >> dictionary before you practice libel about another individuals >> conduct. -David- > >Libel? Get a clue, man. Are you seriously claiming that men are as >likely to be addressed in terms such as "bright-eyes and pretty"? >That, underlying that, isn't a culture which tries to reduce women to >objects of attraction instead of thinking people? You seemed to be >implying that attractive people were somehow less intelligent, >certainly. The statement that I made a sexist remark was what I considered erroneous. Do you know of any women that are offended with a comment like "bright-eyed and pretty?" Is it an attempt to dominate the recipient? Was it based on her gender? Was it incorrect? I find women very attractive. That I express it gives me no shame. > >david carlton >carlton@husc.harvard.edu > # david@wubios.wustl.edu ^ David J. Camp # # david%wubios@wugate.wustl.edu < * > +1 314 382 0584 # # ...!uunet!wugate!wubios!david v "God Bless Terra." # # "The Truth will set you free. --- Power to the People! #
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9107300638.AA11696@wubios>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!davidReferences:
<9107300305.AA15415@husc8>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,6abc03471515819f X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-30 03:43:58 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!david From: david@wubios.wustl.edu (David J. Camp) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Richard Stallman's Most Obnoxious Message-ID: <9107300638.AA11696@wubios> Date: 30 Jul 91 06:38:07 GMT References: <9107300305.AA15415@husc8> Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 72