🚀 go-pugleaf

And the winning response (e-mail) is:

|What makes you think the LPF opposes information hoarding?  Although
|I'm sure most of its members oppose it, I don't think it's official
|LPF policy to *not* hoard.
|
|The FSF is only a member of LPF.  Rather than posting this to
|gnu.misc.discuss, you should have sent mail to league@prep.ai.mit.edu.

ok, case closed.  Oh, here's the original message:

>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jul 1991 15:14:25 GMT, Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM (Dan2) said:

>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jul 1991 03:56:27 GMT, Dan_Jacobson@ATT.COM said:

Dan> Though I'm 99% sure it isn't the case, I want to make sure that one of
Dan> the facets of League of Programming Freedom (LPF) membership isn't
Dan> that as a member, you would, say, be able to receive in e-mail LPF
Dan> newsletters that non-members wouldn't, say, see posted to
Dan> gnu.misc.discuss, etc. newsgroups.

Dan> Post rather than e-mail replies.

Dan2> I hope nobody took my posting in a negative light, I'm just
Dan2> trying to say "we must face these hard questions (together)".  I
Dan2> am pro-FSF/GNU & a LPF member.