Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73692Re: Comp. Sci. vs Engineering (was Re: NJ wants to license programmers)
From: Andy Wessels
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1991 15:38
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1991 15:38
29 lines
2482 bytes
2482 bytes
In article <9107300407.AA04935@spls5.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>, huw@spls5.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp (Huw Jonathan Rogers) writes: |> There is definitely room for a programming department, but if it's |> got to have a parent for gods sake give it to Elec Eng, since at least |> they're engineers and know what "manufacturing" actually means. You are a bigger fool than I thought. Electrical Engineering I S N O T the place to teach an engineering approach to programming. If you were really an expert as you allude to, you would know that COMPUTER ENGINEERING is a seperate disipline within engineering. What you are saying is similar to telling a Mechanical Engineer to design a bridge, just because that engineer has knowledge in tool frame design for lathes. The principles are the same, but there are differences. Engineering is by nature a cross disipline field. What is done in Mechanical relates to Civil and Electrical, and Computers in all but the simplest systems. A good electrical engineer will understand that there are differences, but is not expected to understand the caveats (sp?) of computers. That is the area that is best left to the computer engineer. If you think that this is utter bullshit, go up to the first electrical engineer and ask that person what a DAT or a LSA is. Or ask them what a PMMU is. Unless they have done graduate studies or are designing computers, they will most likely look at you rather funny. PS. A DAT in this sense is not a Digital Audio Tape. It is something that is important to computers, not to audio sound. andy wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jul30.153850.28156@news.nd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!thor.cc.nd.edu!wesselsReferences:
<15046.Jul2320.03.1391@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Jul24.152751.2324@news.larc.nasa.gov> <2372.Jul2720.44.5791@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Jul29.151510.17927@news.larc.nasa.gov> <9107300407.AA04935@spls5.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,624fa0d9d693a21f X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-30 14:34:50 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!thor.cc.nd.edu!wessels From: wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu (Andy Wessels) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Comp. Sci. vs Engineering (was Re: NJ wants to license programmers) Message-ID: <1991Jul30.153850.28156@news.nd.edu> Date: 30 Jul 91 15:38:50 GMT References: <15046.Jul2320.03.1391@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Jul24.152751.2324@news.larc.nasa.gov> <2372.Jul2720.44.5791@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Jul29.151510.17927@news.larc.nasa.gov> <9107300407.AA04935@spls5.ccs.mt.nec.co.jp> Sender: news@news.nd.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu (Andy Wessels) Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame Lines: 41