Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73740Re: NJ wants to license programmers
From: David E. Bernholdt
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1991 21:42
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1991 21:42
51 lines
3091 bytes
3091 bytes
In article <1991Jul25.234317.23841@watson.ibm.com> metzger@watson.ibm.com (Perry E. Metzger) writes: >Is there any evidence that, in a studio where such changes >are possible, that a simple "never touch the red knob" from the >studio engineer would not be sufficient? Not a radio studio, but... Twice now, we've had users bring down one or more of our file servers because they were trying to get a 1/4" tape out of the drive. How, you ask? The tape drive is on the front of the CPU cabinet. Above the CPU is a keyswitch which controls power to the entire rack (CPU & disks). Despite being told how to load and unload tapes from the drive, each of these people decided perhaps the key has something to do with it and turned it. This is equivalent to the "never touch the red knob", I think. The argument is not whether the key/knob should be there, but whether the average person (not engineer or system manager) is likely to play with it. >Incidently, in the average kitchen, there are devices like knives and >gas burners that are capable of killing and maiming, but few people >find it necessary to license people to cook. No, but in a resturaunt, where bad hygiene can impact many people, you have periodic inspections and certifications by the local government. I'm not saying licensing of programmers (or anything else) is good or bad. The point is that goverments often feel it necessary to step in to protect the "public" from someone doing something stupid or even malicious. Something like the runaway x-ray machine, however should be taken care of by testing of the whole apparatus, harware interlocks to prevent high emissions even if the software requests it, and perhaps government licensing of the _machine_ or certification of the test procedures, _not_ licensing the programmer. The thing to find out about the NJ bill and the people behind it is how much of their motivation is greed (license fees) versus some idea about protecting the public. Knowing that, you know how to counter attack. While all this discussion has been going on, what's been happening in NJ? Can anybody post the text of the proposed bill or anything substantive about what they intend to do? -- David Bernholdt bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu Quantum Theory Project bernhold@ufpine.bitnet University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 904/392 6365
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30046@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!rex!uflorida!bernholdReferences:
<1991Jul23.175402.25728@watson.ibm.com> <1991Jul24.170415.24745@news.nd.edu> <1991Jul25.234317.23841@watson.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,624fa0d9d693a21f X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-26 23:13:21 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!rex!uflorida!bernhold From: bernhold@red8 (David E. Bernholdt) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: NJ wants to license programmers Message-ID: <30046@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> Date: 26 Jul 91 21:42:07 GMT References: <1991Jul23.175402.25728@watson.ibm.com> <1991Jul24.170415.24745@news.nd.edu> <1991Jul25.234317.23841@watson.ibm.com> Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU Organization: Quantum Theory Project, Univ. of Florida Lines: 51