Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73790Re: NJ wants to license programmers
From: Andy Wessels
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1991 17:04
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1991 17:04
41 lines
2982 bytes
2982 bytes
In article <1991Jul23.175402.25728@watson.ibm.com>, metzger@watson.ibm.com (Perry E. Metzger) writes: |> Kind of silly, isn't it? Why are you bringing it up as a good thing, |> when the licensing of DJ's is so obviously useless... |> [stuff deleted] |> Perry Metzger |> |> -- |> "Live Free or Die!" |> For information on the Libertarian Party, call 1-800-682-1776 The licensing of DJ's is important. Radio stations broadcast in very densly packed badwidth. In this RF spectrum are Police, Fire, Airports, Television, and even Cellular phones. Multiple stations are on most frequencies (both television and radio). Broadcasting with too much power, on the wrong frequency, or inappropriate material can cause lost ecconomic revenue at best to lost lives at the other end of the spectrum. The realm of imbedded electronics is growing. The domain of software is also growing to fill this need, as well as the current needs. Software has also matured into a discipline. Software design is not an art as it has been suggested, rather the art of software is in the algorithm design, not in the coding. The new generation of software must be readable and maintainable. There is no option in this. The work that you do for company X has the possibility of out living your stay at that company. Do I advocate a program of licensing for home/ametur use. No, I do not. But, as software is a mature discipline, I do advocate it for the _professional_ writing code that is either for sale directly, or for code that is used in a commercial or industrial environment. I do not know wat the future holds as far as software or hardware; no one does. But there is a general concensus, at least in my realm of understanding, that the next generation of computers is going to make today's 'hot' machines look like hard wired mainframes. The same holds for software. True professionals would not have a problem with some sort of licensing, especially if there were continuing education involved. This may not be the best way, but it is a way to stay current, and be able to say 'hey, I really know what is going on'. andy wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jul24.170415.24745@news.nd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!thor.cc.nd.edu!wesselsReferences:
<1991Jul19.160827.876@watson.ibm.com> <1991Jul19.225454.816@exurchn1.ericsson.se> <59257@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <1991Jul22.140553.24030@news.nd.edu> <1991Jul23.175402.25728@watson.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,624fa0d9d693a21f X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-24 16:32:26 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!thor.cc.nd.edu!wessels From: wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu (Andy Wessels) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: NJ wants to license programmers Message-ID: <1991Jul24.170415.24745@news.nd.edu> Date: 24 Jul 91 17:04:15 GMT References: <1991Jul19.160827.876@watson.ibm.com> <1991Jul19.225454.816@exurchn1.ericsson.se> <59257@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <1991Jul22.140553.24030@news.nd.edu> <1991Jul23.175402.25728@watson.ibm.com> Sender: news@news.nd.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu (Andy Wessels) Organization: Univ. of Notre Dame Lines: 53