Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73836Re: free software creates a new kind of [free] monopoly?
From: Thomas M. Breuel
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1991 14:28
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1991 14:28
15 lines
1621 bytes
1621 bytes
In article <23261@cbmvax.commodore.com> dlarson@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dale Larson) writes: How can one program, no matter how good and how well-maintained, possibly meet the different needs, styles, philosophies, etc. of hundreds of millions of text- editor users? I think the point was that, for the good of the users, there must be competing programs. Right now there doesn't seem to be a likely way for some group to get paid to write a free editor to compete with emacs, and one that costs good money starts with an unfair disadvantage... If there is enough demand for a free, alternative editor, then "some group will get paid". For the time being, GNU also supports a variety of editing and editor styles, through modes in GNU emacs, and as separate programs, such as an ed clone and a vi clone.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TMB.91Jul21102814@volterra.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!ai-lab!life!tmbReferences:
<9107191747.AA23652@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <23261@cbmvax.commodore.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,566ddbfb9b33042 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-22 00:12:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!ai-lab!life!tmb From: tmb@ai.mit.edu (Thomas M. Breuel) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: free software creates a new kind of [free] monopoly? Message-ID: <TMB.91Jul21102814@volterra.ai.mit.edu> Date: 21 Jul 91 14:28:14 GMT References: <9107191747.AA23652@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <23261@cbmvax.commodore.com> Sender: news@ai.mit.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab Lines: 15 In-reply-to: dlarson@cbmvax.commodore.com's message of 20 Jul 91 10:40:04 GMT