Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #73923Re: NJ wants to license programmers
From: Eli Brandt
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1991 19:55
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1991 19:55
51 lines
3281 bytes
3281 bytes
In article <1991Jul22.140553.24030@news.nd.edu> wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu (Andy Wessels) writes: >Engineering is moving towards requiring practicing engineers to be registered >witht the state(s) that they practice in (though not required today) It would >be analagous (sp?) to the bar exam for lawyers or the boards for doctors. This >is a way for the state to help assure that the people practicing are competent >and not outside of there realm of competency. This type of exam is a >_professional_ certification. Programmers are a _professional_ group of >people. There is software that is very difficult and has the potential effect >of taking several lives. Mentioned has been medical software and software that [ Additional "software is life-critical" ] >Before I get flamed to death (asbestos suit being donned at this minute :-), >please consider that there may be lives involved in software. The actions This is the best reason I can think of to keep government out of it. The only person who should decide whether a programmer is qualified to write software for an X-ray machine is the owner, who is also responsible for negligence. The fact that the government has certified me to have a degree in XYZ does not mean that I am competent, and thus would be dangerously misleading. Nor does the converse hold. >could be devistating. The idea that NJ wants to convey is some sort of >_professional_ standards, based solely upon what I have read in this newsgroup. >There intentions are to promote solid software, and not screwed up hack jobs >written by fly-by-night operations. Consider that Disk-Jockeys working at >stations over 100 watts _must_ be liscenced by the FCC. As the transmitter Not parallel. Pumping a kW of rf at the wrong frequency can cause harm to many people without their consent. If you purchase buggy software (or worse, purchase without testing!) you harm yourself with your consent. wrt the FCC, we can discuss frequency privatization some other time... >power goes up, so do the requiremnents. And the DJ may not have anything >to do with the station outside of his little room. Huh? The fundamental problem with licensing: I want to write code for Joe Random. He want me to write code for him. New Jersey says "No, you haven't accumlated enough continued-education credit hours". We both lose. > >andy >wessels@thor.cc.nd.edu Eli "@gang.umass.edu" Brandt I'm voting for Frank Zappa, meself.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33705@dime.cs.umass.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!stanford.edu!hsdndev!encore!m2c!risky.ecs.umass.edu!dime!smectos!eliReferences:
<1991Jul19.160827.876@watson.ibm.com> <1991Jul19.225454.816@exurchn1.ericsson.se> <59257@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <1991Jul22.140553.24030@news.nd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,624fa0d9d693a21f X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-22 15:48:15 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!stanford.edu!hsdndev!encore!m2c!risky.ecs.umass.edu!dime!smectos!eli From: eli@smectos.gang.umass.edu (Eli Brandt) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: NJ wants to license programmers Message-ID: <33705@dime.cs.umass.edu> Date: 22 Jul 91 19:55:50 GMT References: <1991Jul19.160827.876@watson.ibm.com> <1991Jul19.225454.816@exurchn1.ericsson.se> <59257@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <1991Jul22.140553.24030@news.nd.edu> Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu Reply-To: eli@smectos.CS.UMASS.EDU (Eli Brandt) Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst Lines: 51