Re: Patent on a standard-byte order for intermachine communication

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #73961

#73961

From: Geoff Lane
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1991 09:04

6 lines
925 bytes

This is insane!  Is there no longer a requirement that a patent only be
presented for the description of a non-obvious technique or application?
-- 
Geoff. Lane.                                  Janet: zzassgl@uk.ac.mcc.uts
UTS Sys Admin, Manchester Computing Centre, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3031@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!mucs!mccuts!zzassgl

References: <9107131607.AA14833@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <MONTNARO.91Jul14010006@spyder.crd.ge.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,9a4c815047ed049b
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-15 23:44:06 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!mucs!mccuts!zzassgl
From: zzassgl@uts.mcc.ac.uk (Geoff Lane)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Patent on a standard-byte order for intermachine communication
Message-ID: <3031@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk>
Date: 15 Jul 91 09:04:52 GMT
References: <9107131607.AA14833@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <MONTNARO.91Jul14010006@spyder.crd.ge.com>
Organization: Manchester Computing Centre, Manchester, England, M13 9PL
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message