Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74082Re: Specialized software
From: Paul Barton-Davis
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1991 16:33
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1991 16:33
38 lines
2862 bytes
2862 bytes
In article <2864@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> LeBlanc@uk.ac.mcc (A. V. Le Blanc) writes: >Earlier in this thread, it was suggested that a company would not >pay, e.g., $100000 for software which nine other companies would >then grab under the GPL, while with no GPL all ten companies would >contribute $10000 each. > >Why couldn't all ten companies contribute to have something >written under the GPL? Several Big Names have contributed to >the GNU project. In that case, of course, the project was started >before the contributions were received. But for specialised >software, the companies who are going to use it would know >who their competitors are and find it easier to coordinate funding. > >Why should they contribute, you ask? Because if your nine >competitors are going to share the cost of a tool which will >threaten your share of the market, and if your contribution is >considerably less than the cost of going your own way and buying >an equivalent tool, you cannot afford not to contribute. And, >just as freely available programs benefit from wide usage, which >helps spot bugs and weaknesses quicker, which finds fixes for them >faster, and which makes new contributions to them, so too the same >benefits would accrue to companies who shared the expense of writing >a specialised software package. What you don't mention is why they might each, individually, want the software in the first place. Most clients that I have come across who want specialized software systems are hoping it will give them a competitive advantage in the marketplace. It won't appeal to them one bit to ask their fellow competitors to share in the costs - they don't want their competitors to even know the software exists until they have it in production, cutting costs, or whatever. This is, of course, the problem with competition. -- "When in some obscure country town, the farmers come together to a special town meeting, to express their opinion on some subject that is vexing the land, that I think is the true Congress, and the most respectable one that is ever assembled in the United States." - Thoreau
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jul10.163352.7759@beaver.cs.washington.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!stowe.cs.washington.edu!pauldReferences:
<gcR8bVW00VI840kp58@andrew.cmu.edu> <BmoR521w164w@mantis.co.uk> <2864@m1.cs.man.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,f8ba9bb4a8fd2d37 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-10 11:52:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!stowe.cs.washington.edu!pauld From: pauld@stowe.cs.washington.edu (Paul Barton-Davis) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Specialized software Message-ID: <1991Jul10.163352.7759@beaver.cs.washington.edu> Date: 10 Jul 91 16:33:52 GMT References: <gcR8bVW00VI840kp58@andrew.cmu.edu> <BmoR521w164w@mantis.co.uk> <2864@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle Lines: 38