Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74123Re: Santa Cruz Operation settles Lotus lawsuit
From: Thomas Hoberg
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1991 19:57
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1991 19:57
46 lines
3153 bytes
3153 bytes
In article <1991Jun24.102430.9536@ukpoit.co.uk>, alan@ukpoit.co.uk (Alan Barclay) writes: |> In article <1991Jun22.223038.4257@weyrich.UUCP> orville@weyrich.UUCP (Orville R. Weyrich) writes: |> >In article <1991Jun21.143836.16559@ukpoit.co.uk> alan@ukpoit.co.uk (Alan Barclay) writes: |> >>In article <FISCHER.91Jun19230614@abel.iesd.auc.dk> fischer@iesd.auc.dk (Lars P. Fischer) writes: |> >>> |> >>[ON SCO dropping their spreadsheet] |> >>> |> >>>It is also very unfortunate. Given that SCO is (partly) owned by |> >>>MicroSoft, they would potentially have some real muscle behind them if |> >>>they choose to counter the claim. |> >>> |> >> |> >>But it's in Microsoft's intrest for the claim to succeed. These look and |> >>feel cases are good for the big boys and bad for the little guy. |> >>Microsoft aren't going to set a precedent which is going to be bad for |> >>when they decide to sue DR for DR-DOS, or whoever they want to go for. |> > |> >I would love to see MS try that -- MS-DOS itself started out as a clone of |> >DR's popular [at the time] CP/M operating system. But of course, DR can't |> >complain too loudly itself, as CP/M is very reminiscent of DEC's RSX |> >(and perhaps other earlier DEC operating systems). |> > |> |> Just as 123 is a clone of visicalc....... But Lotus bought the company (or at least one of the two developers). I have never liked any Lotus stuff I tried so far, but I haven't tried Improve yet. I'd really like to see a GNU version of Improve. I wounder what would happen if someone donated a 1-2-3 clone anonymously to the public domain? I never thought that I'd get to hate lawyers and I haven't even had a divorce yet (never married, either). |> -- |> Alan Barclay |> iT | E-mail : alan@ukpoit.uucp |> Barker Lane | BANG-STYLE : .....!ukc!ukpoit!alan |> CHESTERFIELD S40 1DY | VOICE : +44 246 214241 ---- Thomas M. Hoberg | UUCP: tmh@gmdtub.first.gmd.de or tmh%gmdtub@tub.UUCP c/o GMD Berlin | ...!unido!tub!gmdtub!tmh (Europe) or D-1000 Berlin 12 | ...!unido!tub!tmh Hardenbergplatz 2 | ...!pyramid!tub!tmh (World) Germany | BITNET: tmh%DB0TUI6.BITNET@DB0TUI11 or +49-30-254 99 160 | tmh@tub.BITNET
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<807@bigfoot.first.gmd.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!opal!gmdtub!prosun!tmhReferences:
<FISCHER.91Jun19230614@abel.iesd.auc.dk> <1991Jun21.143836.16559@ukpoit.co.uk> <1991Jun22.223038.4257@weyrich.UUCP> <1991Jun24.102430.9536@ukpoit.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1048e3,c93fcdc272214516 X-Google-Attributes: gid1048e3,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,c93fcdc272214516 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-02 14:22:43 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!fauern!opal!gmdtub!prosun!tmh From: tmh@prosun.first.gmd.de (Thomas Hoberg) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Santa Cruz Operation settles Lotus lawsuit Message-ID: <807@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> Date: 2 Jul 91 19:57:52 GMT References: <FISCHER.91Jun19230614@abel.iesd.auc.dk> <1991Jun21.143836.16559@ukpoit.co.uk> <1991Jun22.223038.4257@weyrich.UUCP> <1991Jun24.102430.9536@ukpoit.co.uk> Sender: news@bigfoot.first.gmd.de Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss Organization: GMD-FIRST, D-1000 Berlin 10 Lines: 46