Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74126Re: your mail
From: David J. Camp
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1991 21:37
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1991 21:37
26 lines
1762 bytes
1762 bytes
In Reply to this Note From: <Thomas Hoberg> [text deleted] >|> Just as 123 is a clone of visicalc....... > >But Lotus bought the company (or at least one of the two developers). > >I have never liked any Lotus stuff I tried so far, but I haven't tried Improve >yet. I'd really like to see a GNU version of Improve. I wounder what would happen >if someone donated a 1-2-3 clone anonymously to the public domain? I never thought >that I'd get to hate lawyers and I haven't even had a divorce yet (never married, >either). > I see no reason for GNU to clone 123 or Improv. The GNU project should offer products with state-of-the-art interfaces. The 123 interface is not as advanced as pull-down menus, and since neither of us has used Improv, I see no reason that we can recommend it as a model of a GNU product. Cloning the product of a known look-and-feel litigant is not smart. -David- # david@wubios.wustl.edu ^ David J. Camp # # david%wubios@wugate.wustl.edu < * > +1 314 382 0584 # # ...!uunet!wugate!wubios!david v "God Loves Material Things." # # One is not Gullible to use the GLGPL! #
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9107022137.AA13383@wubios>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!davidReferences:
<807@bigfoot.first.gmd.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,c93fcdc272214516 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-02 15:53:39 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!wubios.wustl.edu!david From: david@wubios.wustl.edu (David J. Camp) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <9107022137.AA13383@wubios> Date: 2 Jul 91 21:37:26 GMT References: <807@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 26