🚀 go-pugleaf

In Reply to this Note From: <Joe Buck>
[text deleted]
>>Which of these conditions is the cause for the confusing clauses about
>>advertising?  I still do not know an adequate disclaimer to place on a
>>product derived from Reno code.  -David-
>
>None of these conditions.  I have nothing to do with CSRG, the people
>who bring you bsd4.x.  You'll need to talk to them.
>
>I suspect the restrictions on advertising are to avoid ruining Berkeley's
>reputation if you do a port, botch the job, and say you're selling Berkeley
>Unix.  I don't know, though.
>
>Also, everything I said in the previous message is my opinion only.

I do not mind being required to not advertise that the sources come
from Berkeley.  The problem is that the Reno copyright both REQUIRES
and PROHIBITS the user from advertising the source of the code.
-David-

# david@wubios.wustl.edu             ^     David J. Camp                #
# david%wubios@wugate.wustl.edu    < * >   +1 314 382 0584              #
# ...!uunet!wugate!wubios!david      v     "God Loves Material Things." #
# One is not Gullible to use the GLGPL!                                 #