Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74146Re: why the library license
From: Industrial Poet
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 1991 11:37
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 1991 11:37
25 lines
1483 bytes
1483 bytes
drmorris@athena.mit.edu (David R. Morrison) writes: > I wrote: > > edguer@charlie.CES.CWRU.Edu (Aydin Edguer) writes: > > > You may also be making good use of their work. But unless you give back > > > something to the author, you are ripping the author off by charging someo > > > else for the authors labor without reimbursing the author. > > > > But the author does not want reimbursment. If he did, he would not have > > released his software under the GPL. > > The reimbursment the authour wants is not cash, but shared and improved > software. But I am not earning anything the author wants by my use of his software. Nor am I preventing him from gaining the reimbursment he desires from his software. So why should I reimburse him, and what should I reimburse him with? Does this mean that if I decide to use some GNU software, I am *obliged* to provide the world with some 'free' software in return? mathew
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<u66J513w164w@mantis.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathewReferences:
<DRMORRIS.91Jul3184749@hydrox-cookie.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,f8ba9bb4a8fd2d37 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-04 08:47:42 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Industrial Poet) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: why the library license Message-ID: <u66J513w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 4 Jul 91 11:37:53 GMT References: <DRMORRIS.91Jul3184749@hydrox-cookie.mit.edu> Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 25