Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74173Re: Specialized software
From: Miron Cuperman
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1991 09:08
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 1991 09:08
44 lines
2914 bytes
2914 bytes
dd26+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas F. DeJulio) writes: >miron@cs.sfu.ca (Miron Cuperman) writes: >> What do you mean "the GPL doesn't hurt anybody"? If you put the GPL >> on specialized software, the authors of the software will not recover >> their cost. Once they see that, they will not write the software >> in the first place. Then the customers will not be able to get the >> software they want. So both the would be authors and their customers >> are hurt. >You're assuming a particular way of working. Let's use the >service-based as opposed to product-based approach. >Let's assume company X needs a particular piece of specialized >software. They pay programmer Y to write a package for them. The >programmer writes it and releases it under the GNU copyleft -- he's >not selling the product (the software), but the service of having >written it. Once company X has its software, both that company and >the programmer are free to distribute the source if they want to >(though neither is obligated unless they distribute the binary first). >The company may or may not wish to continue purchasing the service of >support from the programmer at this point. Lets try some numbers. Let us say that a company can develop software at a cost of $200K and sell it to 10 customers for $40K each. Let us also say that they can provide support at $15K per year costing them $10K per year per customer. If they "hoard" the software they will make $200K plus $50K per year. If the put it under the GPL they will sell one copy and all the other customers will copy that. They will lose $160K and will make $50K per year on support. If the lifetime of the software is 3 years or less or if the margin of profit on support is decreased they will not be able to recover the costs. I have just shown a realistic situation where the GPL doesn't work. Do you agree that not all software should be distributed under the GPL? "hoarding" the software is a way of distributing the cost of the initial work on all of the customers. >Doug DeJulio -- by Miron Cuperman <miron@cs.sfu.ca>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jul6.090850.18499@cs.sfu.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!lll-winken!aunro!alberta!brazeau.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ubc-cs!fornax!mironReferences:
<1991Jul2.203850.6505@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <DAVEG.91Jul2180948@torment.cs.caltech.edu> <1991Jul3.053824.11489@Think.COM> <16758.Jul419.46.5591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <RYAN.91Jul4172912@ra.cs.umb.edu> <1991Jul5.053513.15758@cs.sfu.ca> <gcR8bVW00VI840kp5Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,f8ba9bb4a8fd2d37 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-07-06 03:29:16 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!lll-winken!aunro!alberta!brazeau.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ubc-cs!fornax!miron From: miron@cs.sfu.ca (Miron Cuperman) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Specialized software Message-ID: <1991Jul6.090850.18499@cs.sfu.ca> Date: 6 Jul 91 09:08:50 GMT References: <1991Jul2.203850.6505@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <DAVEG.91Jul2180948@torment.cs.caltech.edu> <1991Jul3.053824.11489@Think.COM> <16758.Jul419.46.5591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <RYAN.91Jul4172912@ra.cs.umb.edu> <1991Jul5.053513.15758@cs.sfu.ca> <gcR8bVW00VI840kp5 Organization: Simon Fraser University Lines: 44