Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74190GLGPL and shared libraries
From: Tom Wood
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1991 14:11
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1991 14:11
11 lines
1073 bytes
1073 bytes
I'm trying to get a handle on the GLGPL. In particular, would building and using a shared version of libg++ be a simple way to meet the terms of the GLGPL. As I see it, an application vendor could, by using a shared libg++, not have to do *anything* different in the way he does business. The users can get the sources to the library, modifiy it, and not have to deal with the executables that use it in any fasion. --- Tom Wood (919) 248-6067 Data General, Research Triangle Park, NC wood@dg-rtp.dg.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jun19.141134.19083@dg-rtp.dg.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!dg-rtp!usenetShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1863b2678e8debd5,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-06-21 04:26:47 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!dg-rtp!usenet From: wood@gen-rtx.rtp.dg.com (Tom Wood) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: GLGPL and shared libraries Message-ID: <1991Jun19.141134.19083@dg-rtp.dg.com> Date: 19 Jun 91 14:11:34 GMT Sender: usenet@dg-rtp.dg.com (Usenet Administration) Distribution: gnu Organization: Data General Corporation, RTP, NC. Lines: 11