Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74192Re: c++ vs ada results
From: Francois Pinard
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 19:16
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1991 19:16
43 lines
3182 bytes
3182 bytes
In article <STEVE.91Jun18175519@diana.Advansoft.COM> steve@Advansoft.COM (Steve Savitzky) writes:
In article <1991Jun18.042950.4473@netcom.COM> jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter) writes:
Sorry. I retract my statement that when it comes to compilers
you get what you pay for, at least as it concerns the particular
case of GNU. [...] Why something free would be quite bug free
and would have great support in contrast to something that costs
money is completely beyond me [...] Anybody care to enlighten me?
Well, it has something to do with the fact that *anyone* can fix bugs
in the GNU software, because they have it in source form. [...]
If I may, there is an even deeper reason, which is expressed quite
clearly in the GNU Manifesto:
The paradigm of competition is a race: by rewarding the
winner, we encourage everyone to run faster. When capitalism
really works this way, it does a good job; but its defenders
are wrong in assuming it always works this way. If the
runners forget why the reward is offered and become intent on
winning, no matter how, they may find other strategies--such
as, attacking other runners. If the runners get into a fist
fight, they will all finish late.
GNU has some success partly because of the many high quality people
which are part of it, partly because the serious goals they all share,
and the fact that energies are not spoiled into slowing everybody
else. On the other hand, GNU is also trying to break out (of) the
competition circle, which is a factor of slowness in these times.
Free does not mean dumb: this is a strong and common prejudice, quite
deeply implanted in the mind of many decision-maker's mind, as I often
experience when I discuss with them. Some are physiologically unable
to have confidence in something they did not pay for.
One day, it might happen that competition in the world of computer
software will be redefined, for real, and towards more constructive
terms; when this will be, GNU might well need to deeply adapt. But
the time has not come yet, and the Walrus is still waiting :-).
--
Franc,ois Pinard ``Vivement GNU!'' pinard@iro.umontreal.ca
(514) 588-4656 cp 886 L'Epiphanie (Qc) J0K 1J0 ...!uunet!iros1!pinard
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PINARD.91Jun20151646@kovic.IRO.UMontreal.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!olivea!uunet!bonnie.concordia.ca!IRO.UMontreal.CA!pinardReferences:
<1991Jun12.164741.412@news.larc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <NELSON.91Jun15224835@sun.clarkson.edu> <1991Jun18.042950.4473@netcom.COM> <STEVE.91Jun18175519@diana.Advansoft.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e54364a0ce166454 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-06-21 04:26:47 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!samsung!olivea!uunet!bonnie.concordia.ca!IRO.UMontreal.CA!pinard From: pinard@IRO.UMontreal.CA (Francois Pinard) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: c++ vs ada results Message-ID: <PINARD.91Jun20151646@kovic.IRO.UMontreal.CA> Date: 20 Jun 91 19:16:46 GMT References: <1991Jun12.164741.412@news.larc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun12.201740.16463@netcom.COM> <NELSON.91Jun15224835@sun.clarkson.edu> <1991Jun18.042950.4473@netcom.COM> <STEVE.91Jun18175519@diana.Advansoft.COM> Sender: news@IRO.UMontreal.CA Organization: Universite' de Montre'al Lines: 43 In-Reply-To: steve@Advansoft.COM's message of 19 Jun 91 00:55:19 GMT