Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #744Re: Apple loses "look and feel" lawsuit (forwarded)
From: Dale Southard Jr.
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 16:17
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1992 16:17
48 lines
2941 bytes
2941 bytes
In article <Bsyns3.93L@news.udel.edu>, johnston@me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston) writes: <many excellent points deleted> > To overturn Lotus v. Borland, and more importantly to achieve > an unequivocal change in user interface law, the focus in future > needs to be on principles rather than personalities. In my opinion, > boycotts are good at demonizing, but lousy at focusing debate on > the real issues. And my point is this: Why continue with a policy that so clearly results in a "them-and-us" division when one could gain allies (and allies WITHIN APPLE) by a simple change. I am not suggesting LPF anounce an alliance with Apple and endorse their products, only that they adopt a method of protest that: 1) Does not alienate those who agree with LPF but, for whatever reason, use Apple (or other boycotted products). 2) Is more likely to result in a CHANGE in Apple's policy (though any change would likely be de-facto rather than a statement of future policy). Is this solution too simple? Does it cause an unacceptable loss of face for LPF? I don't think either is the case. What it does do is allow LPF to marshal new troops. As I said earlier, there are many programmers that disagree with Apple Inc. as much as LPF. It is somewhat silly to assume that the everyone who owns/uses/programs anything made by Apple agrees with policies created by a few individuals in ivory towers. As has been observed before, the lack of gcc on Apple platforms is only an inconvience to those that both use Apple AND have enough respect for LPF/GNUs position to abide by their wishes. Apple hardly cares wether or not gcc exists -- yet they DO care about PR (notice how quick they procured a patch to fix 32-bit incompatability in older machines -- I really doubt that there were very many of us using >16 MB in the machines, yet our internet petition had well in excess of 500 signatures in the first week). Perhaps, as as Bill may have eluded to in his earlier post, the boycott is more about choosing an easy scapegoat than changing attitudes.... -- /* Dale Southard Jr. Sr. Rigger */ /* University of Toledo AFF/I SL/I */ /* dsouth@uoft02.utoledo.edu D-11216 */ /* Department of Chemistry -- "Just another skydiving grad student." */
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug14.111732.9426@uoft02.utoledo.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!dsouthReferences:
<LEE.92Aug11144015@meercat.wang.com> <BsuIK7.32F@news.udel.edu> <1992Aug13.235055.9417@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <Bsyns3.93L@news.udel.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!dsouth From: dsouth@uoft02.utoledo.edu (Dale Southard Jr.) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Apple loses "look and feel" lawsuit (forwarded) Message-ID: <1992Aug14.111732.9426@uoft02.utoledo.edu> Date: 14 Aug 92 11:17:32 EST References: <LEE.92Aug11144015@meercat.wang.com> <BsuIK7.32F@news.udel.edu> <1992Aug13.235055.9417@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <Bsyns3.93L@news.udel.edu> Organization: University of Toledo, Computer Services Lines: 48