Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74426Re: Illogic and Apple
From: geyer
Date: Sat, 04 May 1991 18:39
Date: Sat, 04 May 1991 18:39
48 lines
2686 bytes
2686 bytes
In article <1991May4.052108.695@visix.com> amanda@visix.com (Amanda Walker) writes: > On the other hand, what's the use of going through the effort and > expense of putting together a really good piece of software, if anyone > else can come by and take your design, lock, stock, and barrel, > without even giving you the time of day? No one is suggesting that anyone's design should be ripped off "lock, stock, and barrel." This is way too extreme. You are objecting to the view that what Apple wants is to forbid anything that looks even remotely like a Macintosh. You do you think it helps your case to suggest something even less believable in the opposite direction? > Why should Apple, which has invested millions of dollars and thousands of > hours into user interface research, foot the design bill for the rest of > the industry? Because the Mac is mostly a ripoff of earlier designs, no matter what the situation with statutes of limitations. Why should Apple own what they did not even invent and much of which is obvious or trivial? > If Apple, Lotus, and the like win precedent-setting court cases over > software similarity, then (as RMS pointed out) the GNU project is doomed. > > Only if their goal is to produce the same thing as everyone else. If GNU is > going to be just another UNIX, why bother? As I am sure you know, the GNU folks *love* features. GNU will not be just another UNIX. No way! But why should they fear that they will infringe on AT&T's rights if they don't break "ls"? Do we really have to say "gls"? Maybe that is too close to the same "look and feel" as well. How many ways are there to say "list" that have never been used on any computer anywhere? Suppose that it is "gls" and that's o. k., but I am allowed to alias it to "ls"? Didn't Lotus win a case that said even an interface that could be made by the user to look like 1-2-3 was forbidden? This look-and-feel nonsense is absolute poison. Where *does* it stop? Charles Geyer Department of Statistics University of Chicago geyer@galton.uchicago.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May4.183925.29761@midway.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!jarthur!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,15ed716c9ecc1ded X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-04 13:10:35 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!jarthur!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!midway!news From: geyer@galton.uchicago.edu Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Illogic and Apple Message-ID: <1991May4.183925.29761@midway.uchicago.edu> Date: 4 May 91 18:39:25 GMT Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (NewsMistress) Organization: University of Chicago Lines: 48