Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74445Re: "look and feel" monopoly incentives and MacOS and 1-2-3 origins
From: Adam J. Richter
Date: Mon, 06 May 1991 07:08
Date: Mon, 06 May 1991 07:08
40 lines
2936 bytes
2936 bytes
In article <1991May4.235033.15917@agate.berkeley.edu>, I (Adam R.) wrote: > Copyrights and patents are economic incentives, and not moral rights. In article <RJC.91May5084257@brodie.cstr.ed.ac.uk> rjc@cstr.ed.ac.uk (Richard Caley) responded: >Many (including me) would disagree. Your argument does not adress the >point you seem to want to make, what you support is more like >`copyrights and patents are economic incentives not constitutionally >recognised rights' which is very different. The first paragraph of my posting was an introduction and not the thesis of my argument, which was that MacOS and 1-2-3 do not appear to be examples of programs whose creation depended on the availability of a user interface copyright, and that those who claim otherwise should present more evidence. The references to the constitution and the supreme court were just examples of empirical evidence of the consensus in our society that both copyrights and patents exist only for public benefit. >Many people would argue that the ability to control what happens to >the things which one produces _is_ a basic right and also a >responsibility. For instance it is one of the few things that >liberatarians and marxists seem to agree on. I'm not sure that Marxists would agree with that statement, and I'm not sure that anyone would agree that such a statement extends beyond physical objects. In general if you create something physical, say, a car, and somebody wants to use that car, that other person's use of your car interferes with your own use, and it is that interference which property rights address. On the other hand, if somebody uses your idea, it generally does not interfere with your use of that idea. Has there has ever been a society that extended copyright monopolies to pure ideas in the same way that one can copyright the expression of ideas in art and literature? Some people may take the "intellectual property" analogy literally, but that principle is not the rationale for patents and copyrights as they exist today. Adam J. Richter adam@soda.berkeley.edu 409 Evelyn Avenue, Apt. 312 ....!ucbvax!soda!adam Albany, CA 94706 Home: (415)528-3209
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991May6.070844.8403@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!soda.berkeley.edu!adamReferences:
<1991May4.052108.695@visix.com> <1991May4.235033.15917@agate.berkeley.edu> <RJC.91May5084257@brodie.cstr.ed.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,15ed716c9ecc1ded X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-06 00:15:30 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!soda.berkeley.edu!adam From: adam@soda.berkeley.edu (Adam J. Richter) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: "look and feel" monopoly incentives and MacOS and 1-2-3 origins Message-ID: <1991May6.070844.8403@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 6 May 91 07:08:44 GMT References: <1991May4.052108.695@visix.com> <1991May4.235033.15917@agate.berkeley.edu> <RJC.91May5084257@brodie.cstr.ed.ac.uk> Sender: root@agate.berkeley.edu (Charlie Root) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 40