🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991Mar8.064710.25490@searchtech.com> mra@searchtech.com (Michael Almond) writes:
>In article <12467:Mar619:57:5491@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>!In article <901@nddsun1.sps.mot.com> waters@nddsun1.sps.mot.com (Mike Waters) writes:
>!> In article <7308:Mar605:56:5291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>!> NONSENSE! A patent applies to EXACTLY what appears in the claims - no
>!> more, no less.
>!You have no idea what you are talking about.
>I find it hard to weed through all these articles to find out exactly what is
>true and what isn't.
>;-)

Me too. I was off sick with the flu and it was fun for a while, but now
I have to go back to work. Now I'm just sick of hearing the same old
fantasies trotted out again and again.

For everyone's information I write patents for a living. I am an EE/CS
graduate and know personally over a dozen CS grads. who are employed by the
US patent office. Software (or any other) patents are NOT granted
without a lot of investigation and careful scrutiny. I know that, it is
MY JOB TO KNOW!

Have fun with your delusions.

-- 
           *Mike Waters    AA4MW/7  waters@nddsun1.sps.mot.com *
A closed mouth gathers no foot.