Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74718Re: Some patent info & fuel
From: Kenneth J Meltsner
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1991 14:14
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 1991 14:14
39 lines
2747 bytes
2747 bytes
[stuff deleted] |>Well perhaps there should be in the form of recognition, fame, tenure, |>promotions, prizes and so forth. But why should there be *patents*? |>Why should the reward be a government granted monopoly to screw the |>public? |> |>Such monopolies aren't granted for discoveries in physics or chemistry. |>Why should they be granted for discoveries in computer science? Oh, |>computer science is different, you say? It's really not a science, but |>a business. Screwing the public is what it's really all about. And the |>government should support that. It's the American Way. Yeah. Plenty of patents are issued for discoveries in chemistry and physics. Nylon, or Kevlar, or even certain compositions of superconductors are all covered by patents. Look at medicine: patents on artificial joints, drugs, testing systems... And it's okay to have a monopoly if you sew up all the patents in a field -- for example, any number of companies in the drug business have the sole rights to produce unique drugs at whatever price the market will bear. Until recently, software was unusual in that patents could not be issued for new algorithms -- they were considered to be equivalent to new mathematical methods, which are also unpatentable. Now, the Patent Office has decided that novel algorithms and methods are equivalent in patentability to novel compositions of matter or processes, and are not simply mathematics. Before people start attacking software patents, it would really be useful for them to understand exactly what a patent is and what legal protections it provides. =============================================================================== Ken Meltsner | meltsner@crd.ge.com (518) 387-6391 GE Research and Development Center | Fax: (518) 387-7495 P.O. Box 8, Room K1/MB207 | Nothing I say should be attributed Schenectady, NY 12301 | to my employer, and probably vice-versa =================Dep't of Materials Science, ACME Looniversity=================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<17308@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!crdgw1!crd.ge.comReferences:
<873@nddsun1.sps.mot.com> <1991Mar2.092942.6054@Think.COM> <8996@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1991Mar3.235435.15933@midway.uchicago.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,b0a85d23901c1430 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-03-06 03:43:51 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!crdgw1!crd.ge.com From: meltsner@crd.ge.com (Kenneth J Meltsner) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Some patent info & fuel Message-ID: <17308@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> Date: 5 Mar 91 14:14:55 GMT References: <873@nddsun1.sps.mot.com> <1991Mar2.092942.6054@Think.COM> <8996@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1991Mar3.235435.15933@midway.uchicago.edu> Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com Reply-To: meltsner@crd.ge.com Organization: GE Research and Development Center Lines: 39