Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74816Re: Is FSF software really free. (fwd)
From: John Coolidge
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 1991 06:55
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 1991 06:55
45 lines
3390 bytes
3390 bytes
burley@geech.ai.mit.edu (Craig Burley) writes: >In article <1686@tharr.UUCP> gtoal@tharr.UUCP (Graham Toal) writes: > I think a real free market economy is going to mean that people will start > producing software which is *truly* free, in rival to the Gnu project. > [...] the Bsd4.3 people went out of their way to avoid Gnu code when > shaking off the last AT&T shackles recently) >If BSD4.3 people went out of their way to avoid GNU code >for reasons having to do with "freedom", then I suspect it was because >they ultimately want people to incorporate their code in proprietary >products (i.e. *not*-free BSD4.3), whether that was a direct motivation >or, perhaps, a motivation in making their ground rules be to release it in >the public domain. Not necessarily. They may believe (as I do) that it's morally right to not assert control over anyone else's code. Code that I write I wish to maintain control over. Among other things, this means that I want to be able to sell it, shred it, release it into the public domain, copyleft it, or do any number of other things to it. What I choose to do (when it's my code and not a patch to something else; in those cases I follow the original copyright (or, in the more common case, copyleft)) is to make my code usable by anyone but freely distributable. This means that I assert control over only my own code; someone who takes my code and attaches it to a larger work is welcome to control the distribution of _their_ work in any way they choose; they just can't take away the freedom of my code. I believe that this is the "right thing to do". It's a moral judgement, not a legal one; legally, I think the FSF has the right to use their code as a virus, infecting any code it comes into contact with. But I believe such activity is morally wrong, even if done with the best of intentions. Clearly, I'm not too adamant about this --- I do a fair bit of porting and pounding on FSF code and I'm happy to copyleft my changes and release them to the world. But I won't release any code that I originate under the FSF copyleft; I think it's the wrong way to bring about freedom for software. The Berkeley people may well feel the same way. --John -------------------------------------------------------------------------- John L. Coolidge Internet:coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu UUCP:uiucdcs!coolidge Of course I don't speak for the U of I (or anyone else except myself) Copyright 1991 John L. Coolidge. Copying allowed if (and only if) attributed. You may redistribute this article if and only if your recipients may as well.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jan30.065525.7659@julius.cs.uiuc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!sdd.hp.com!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!coolidgeReferences:
<9101270859.AA11098@wubios.wustl.edu> <1686@tharr.UUCP> <BURLEY.91Jan29113805@geech.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,9611924027140fff X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-01-29 23:26:34 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!sdd.hp.com!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!coolidge From: coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu (John Coolidge) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Is FSF software really free. (fwd) Message-ID: <1991Jan30.065525.7659@julius.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 30 Jan 91 06:55:25 GMT References: <9101270859.AA11098@wubios.wustl.edu> <1686@tharr.UUCP> <BURLEY.91Jan29113805@geech.ai.mit.edu> Sender: news@julius.cs.uiuc.edu (USENet News) Reply-To: coolidge@cs.uiuc.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: U of Illinois, Dept. of Computer Science, Systems Research Group Lines: 45