Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74867Re: data compression notes [Re: Anyone want ...]
From: Piercarlo Grandi
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 1991 21:56
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 1991 21:56
48 lines
3064 bytes
3064 bytes
On 20 Feb 91 12:34:01 GMT, brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) said: brnstnd> In article <21698@yunexus.YorkU.CA> oz@yunexus.yorku.ca (Ozan brnstnd> Yigit) writes: oz> That is nice. I think you should publish the algorithm (and a oz> through analysis of it) in some respectable journal. brnstnd> I'm working on a paper. Why not patent it? :-) Seriously, as the FSF might also use patents in the same way as it uses copyrights, to ensure that certain designs can circulate freely instead of being hoarded. Suppose that you do not patent your algorithm; somebody else later can rediscover and patent it, and then *you* have to sue the somebody and prove that you had prior art. If you preempt this by getting a patent and then licensing it for free (to everybody that promises to use it only in copyleft sources, or under similar conditions), this becomes much more difficult, because at the very least your work will turn up in a patent search and subsequent hoarders will have their claim rejected by the Patent Office (hopefully). Naturally there is a snag: while copylefting a source costs nothing, freepatenting an algorithm or a device costs thousands of dollars. Maybe the FSF could decide to do something about this for some possibly important ideas, like establishing a fund and a panel to decide which of the technologies submitted to the FSF should be patented drawing fropm that fund's money. The idea appeals to me a lot, because then the FSF could accumulate a portfolio of freepatents, and if it became suitably attractive, patent portfolio swaps could be arranged with large corporations, thus freeing even more patents. I for one would surely contribute some patentable technology to the FSF; I have posted in the past an algorithm for compiling multiple assignments, and the design of a reverse map MMU, in an attempt to prevent others to patent them eventually. It would have been much better I think to let the FSF patent them and then let everybody use them. I think that Dan Bernstein and others could be contributors too. -- Piercarlo Grandi | ARPA: pcg%uk.ac.aber.cs@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk Dept of CS, UCW Aberystwyth | UUCP: ...!mcsun!ukc!aber-cs!pcg Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, UK | INET: pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PCG.91Feb25215626@odin.cs.aber.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!dcl-cs!aber-cs!athene!pcgReferences:
<812:Feb1720:37:5291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <21698@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <2022:Feb2012:34:0191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,9f0e79e992bd718e X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-02-25 23:45:38 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!dcl-cs!aber-cs!athene!pcg From: pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: data compression notes [Re: Anyone want ...] Message-ID: <PCG.91Feb25215626@odin.cs.aber.ac.uk> Date: 25 Feb 91 21:56:26 GMT References: <812:Feb1720:37:5291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <21698@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <2022:Feb2012:34:0191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Sender: pcg@aber-cs.UUCP Organization: Coleg Prifysgol Cymru Lines: 48 Nntp-Posting-Host: odin In-reply-to: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu's message of 20 Feb 91 12:34:01 GMT