Re: Lotus at it again?

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #74935

#74935

From: Warner Losh
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 1991 10:11

17 lines
1289 bytes

In article <1990Dec31.191828.6333@wsrcc.com> wolfgang@wsrcc.com (Wolfgang S. Rupprecht) writes:
>  What can you do about it?  A couple of things.  Lotus has said that
>  they'll omit from their database anyone who asks.  Therefore, start by
>  writing to the address below.  Tell them that you don't want to be in
>  the database, and tell them exactly what you think of their database.

While I'd like to comment on this issue further, I don't think this is
the right place for the discussion.  However, since you have brought
the topic up, yet failed to provide an address, would it be possible
to post that address?

Thanks a bunch....

Warner
-- 
Warner Losh		imp@Solbourne.COM
We sing about Beauty and we sing about Truth at $10,000 a show.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Jan2.101123.23054@Solbourne.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!stan!imp

References: <1990Dec31.191828.6333@wsrcc.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5219c4c829f8bf15
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-01-02 03:21:12 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!stan!imp
From: imp@Solbourne.COM (Warner Losh)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Lotus at it again?
Keywords: scumbags lotus databases
Message-ID: <1991Jan2.101123.23054@Solbourne.COM>
Date: 2 Jan 91 10:11:23 GMT
References: <1990Dec31.191828.6333@wsrcc.com>
Organization: Solbourne Computers Inc.
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message