(Re: Lotus at it again?) -> alt.conspiracy

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #74937

#74937

From: Graham Toal
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 1991 17:56

11 lines
1052 bytes

In article <1991Jan2.101123.23054@Solbourne.COM> imp@Solbourne.COM (Warner Losh) writes:
>While I'd like to comment on this issue further, I don't think this is
>the right place for the discussion.  However, since you have brought

Good point. May I suggest alt.conspiracy?

Just a short post to change the followup address.

G.
-- 
(* Posted from tharr.uucp - Public Access Unix - +44 (234) 261804 *)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1550@tharr.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!axion!tharr!gtoal

References: <1990Dec31.191828.6333@wsrcc.com> <1991Jan2.101123.23054@Solbourne.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5219c4c829f8bf15
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-01-02 18:48:10 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!ukc!axion!tharr!gtoal
From: gtoal@tharr.UUCP (Graham Toal)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: (Re: Lotus at it again?) -> alt.conspiracy
Keywords: scumbags lotus databases
Message-ID: <1550@tharr.UUCP>
Date: 2 Jan 91 17:56:35 GMT
References: <1990Dec31.191828.6333@wsrcc.com> <1991Jan2.101123.23054@Solbourne.COM>
Reply-To: gtoal@tharr.UUCP (Graham Toal)
Followup-To: alt.conspiracy
Organization: Power Microsystems Ltd
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message