Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #74987Ghostscript: The bad news
From: David Vinayak Wallace
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 1990 09:10
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 1990 09:10
49 lines
2824 bytes
2824 bytes
Date: 16 Dec 90 10:43:00 GMT From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) [QUoting LPD] The copyright that comes with Ghostscript is quite serious: Ghostscript is, in my view, a piece of potentially commercial software that I have developed, that I own, and that I choose to distibute as GNUware. Frankly, for me that took a few days to fully sink in. Peter has written Ghostscript and will allow us to use it and debug it for him. He reserves the right to turn it into a commercial product once we've helped him get it to that point. Then what do we have? A package of what used to be GNUware that we are no longer allowed to modify or perhaps even use? I understand that anything distributed under a copyright like the GNU software can potentially be taken away. (This is a function of the assignment, not the GPL itself. All the ones I've signed or seen indicate that you may take a copy and do with it what you will, but that the foundation can continue to do with the versions it has what it will. But ghostscript is copyright Alladin so this doesn't apply). The ghostscript license doesn't allow for termination for any reason but someone's violation of its terms, but even then non-violating holders may continue their licenses. Now LPD may choose to fork off a version at some point; he can issue software he owns under as many different licences as he wishes. But: 1> older versions retain the old licence, since it doesn't contain a revocation clause, and 2> He may not be able to take private changes people have sent him if they are substantive. This is why rms asks for an assignment for large changes. It's a CYA clause. So the worst-case is that there is a fork someday. I think this changes the magnitude of the occurrence from "disaster" to merely "reprehensible". My regard for the GNU project has been greatly diminished. I sincerely hope someone will restore some order to the world. I hope you do not tar rms nor the GNU project with the same brush you would use on lpd (though it does say "I, Richard Stallman" in the Ghostscript GPL).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<GUMBY.90Dec16041023@Cygnus.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!shelby!neon!neon!gumbyReferences:
<1990Dec16.104300.12930@pegasus.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,96e8683c29413fce,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-12-16 01:10:23 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!shelby!neon!neon!gumby From: gumby@Cygnus.COM (David Vinayak Wallace) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Ghostscript: The bad news Message-ID: <GUMBY.90Dec16041023@Cygnus.COM> Date: 16 Dec 90 09:10:23 GMT References: <1990Dec16.104300.12930@pegasus.com> Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System) Organization: Cygnus Support Lines: 49 In-Reply-To: richard@pegasus.com's message of 16 Dec 90 10:43:00 GMT