Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75045"byte" v.s. "octet"
From: David J. Camp
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 1990 14:22
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 1990 14:22
14 lines
1373 bytes
1373 bytes
In Reply to this Note From: <Alton Harkcom> > I never understood what the confusion was though. Are there systems >which uses 16 bits/byte? And whats the story with IBM? Could the original >poster elaborate a bit (by email if my ignorance is showing :-) I knew of a 12-bit computer that had 6-bit bytes. It used a subset of the ascii character set. Another 12-bit computer (the PDP-8) packed three octets into two 12-bit words. It was very inefficient to work on strings, but you can see the advantage of using the full ascii character set. -David- david@wubios.wustl.edu ^ Mr. David J. Camp david%wubios@wugate.wustl.edu < * > +1 314 382 0584 ...!uunet!wugate!wubios!david v "God loves material things."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9012041422.AA26986@wubios.wustl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!WUBIOS.WUSTL.EDU!davidReferences:
<HARKCOM.90Nov21080149@potato.pa.Yokogawa.Co.jp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,c0b93fb4f7d1c8eb X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-12-04 06:49:35 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!WUBIOS.WUSTL.EDU!david From: david@WUBIOS.WUSTL.EDU (David J. Camp) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: "byte" v.s. "octet" Message-ID: <9012041422.AA26986@wubios.wustl.edu> Date: 4 Dec 90 14:22:51 GMT References: <HARKCOM.90Nov21080149@potato.pa.Yokogawa.Co.jp> Sender: karl@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Lines: 14 Posted: Tue Dec 4 15:22:51 1990