Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75096Some thoughts about the draft GNU library license
From: Amanda Walker
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 1990 19:44
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 1990 19:44
21 lines
1614 bytes
1614 bytes
I am glad to see the draft GNU library license--it addresses many of my problems with applying the more general GPL to runtime libraries. Good job. It occurs to me that on many platforms, it's even easier to comply with it than it seems upon first reading, even for organizations that are wary of distributing linkable object files for their products. I can foresee, for example, non-technical product managers who will decide that this would be "like giving away the source code," even though it is clearly not. However, the new license seems ideal for platforms that support shared libraries. A dynamically-linked executable is by definition an object file that is linked at run time, allowing the library to be replaced as long as the external interface remains constant. It might be worth mentioning this, to avoid having people make anti-GNU knee-jerk reactions. -- Amanda Walker amanda@visix.com Visix Software Inc. ...!uunet!visix!amanda -- X Windows: It could be worse, but it'll take time...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tuvwjjj4fa@visix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!visix!amandaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,b5005a13889f1432,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-11-21 11:44:40 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!visix!amanda From: amanda@visix.com (Amanda Walker) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Some thoughts about the draft GNU library license Message-ID: <tuvwjjj4fa@visix.com> Date: 21 Nov 90 19:44:40 GMT Sender: amanda@visix.com (Amanda Walker) Distribution: gnu Organization: Visix Software Inc., Reston, VA Lines: 21 Posted: Wed Nov 21 20:44:40 1990