Re: xgdb - is it going to be? - Article 75213 - go-pugleaf

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #75213

Re: xgdb - is it going to be?

#75213

From: Thomas J. Pusateri
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 1990 12:16

13 lines
1232 bytes

In article <KINGDON.90Sep12194425@pogo.ai.mit.edu> kingdon@pogo.ai.mit.edu (Jim Kingdon) writes:
>
>As for the design of an X gdb, I think things like editing breakpoint
>commands, source code display, etc *should* be integrated with emacs.
>Why learn the "xgdb" editor when you already know emacs?  It's not

I'm not sure that I agree with this. Although I've run gdb from within
emacs, I don't normally use emacs as my primary editor. Therefore, it
is overhead (and a lot of it) to bring up emacs every time I want a full
screen debugger. A nice X interface would be welcomed.

Tom Pusateri
Duke University

Technical Details

Message-ID: <653228195@macbeth.cs.duke.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!shelby!mcnc!duke!pusateri

References: <15442@reed.UUCP> <KINGDON.90Sep12194425@pogo.ai.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5e9c7c7bf1fe327f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-09-13 05:16:36 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!shelby!mcnc!duke!pusateri
From: pusateri@duke.cs.duke.edu (Thomas J. Pusateri)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: xgdb - is it going to be?
Message-ID: <653228195@macbeth.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 13 Sep 90 12:16:36 GMT
References: <15442@reed.UUCP> <KINGDON.90Sep12194425@pogo.ai.mit.edu>
Organization: Duke University Computer Science Dept.; Durham, N.C.
Lines: 13
Posted: Thu Sep 13 13:16:36 1990

Reply to Parent Message