Re: Discovery vs Invention...

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #75292

#75292

From: Michael O'Dell
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 1990 15:41

6 lines
878 bytes

I've already been gently reminded that Galileo's result is about
constant fields, not inverse-square.

The fog is thick some mornings...

	-Mike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <26053@bellcore.bellcore.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!rutgers!bellcore-2!bellcore!messy!mo

References: <38156@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <9008151215.AA02492@stc06.CTD.ORNL.GOV> <26050@bellcore.bellcore.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5bd6d61cad0e696a
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-08-15 20:07:14 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!rutgers!bellcore-2!bellcore!messy!mo
From: mo@messy.bellcore.com (Michael O'Dell)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Discovery vs Invention...
Message-ID: <26053@bellcore.bellcore.com>
Date: 15 Aug 90 15:41:46 GMT
References: <38156@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <9008151215.AA02492@stc06.CTD.ORNL.GOV> <26050@bellcore.bellcore.com>
Sender: news@bellcore.bellcore.com
Reply-To: mo@bellcore.com (Michael O'Dell)
Organization: Center for Chaotic Repeatabilty
Lines: 6
Posted: Wed Aug 15 16:41:46 1990

Reply to Parent Message