🚀 go-pugleaf

Barry Shein writes

> I've learned that algorithms
> that seem simple to computer people may not be seen the same way by
> others (such as, perhaps, courts).

I have often wondered, as a philosopher of programming, whether part
of the problem is the lack of agreement on the part of programmers
about just what constitutes stealing.

I mention this because, while I agree that certain instances of
hoarding and patent-waving are outrageous, and while I can shout
slogans as loudly as my neighbour, I am by no means ready to state
clearly and accurately all the principles which I believe should
govern sensible laws and sensible activity in this field.

For example, many Americans seem to assume that it is wrong to
control algorithms.  In Britain algorithms can be patented, and
are.  I don't like to see algorithms kept secret, but isn't it
at least arguable that patents encourage making such things
public.  Moreover, I am uncertain as to whether I agree or disagree
with the `law of nature' interpretation.

Comments?

A. V. Le Blanc
University of Manchester