Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75328Innovation
From: Russ Nelson
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 1990 03:41
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 1990 03:41
14 lines
1425 bytes
1425 bytes
One thing I've noticed in this discussion is that people who say "innovation is good" aren't making a distinction between useful innovation and useless innovation. For example, when I wrote the wordprocessor "Galahad" (which is in use by thousands and thousands of people), I didn't know about troff. So, I invented my own command set, using single letter commands preceded by a dot. This is innovation! Is it useful? Of course not. But if L&F copyrights existed at the time, I would have been required by law to "innovate", instead of copying troff's command set. -- --russ (nelson@clutx [.bitnet | .clarkson.edu]) Russ.Nelson@$315.268.6667 We won the cold war. The Russians spent trillions defending their stuff, then they found that they didn't have any stuff. Will we avoid the same trap?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<NELSON.90Aug11234015@sun.clarkson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!image.soe.clarkson.edu!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,a83b98079395c971,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-08-11 23:23:45 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!image.soe.clarkson.edu!news From: nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Innovation Message-ID: <NELSON.90Aug11234015@sun.clarkson.edu> Date: 12 Aug 90 03:41:09 GMT Sender: news@sun.soe.clarkson.edu Reply-To: nelson@clutx.clarkson.edu (aka NELSON@CLUTX.BITNET) Organization: Clarkson University, Potsdam NY Lines: 15 Posted: Sun Aug 12 04:41:09 1990