Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75414Re: look-n-feel: cost without benefit
From: Stacy L Ramirez
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 1990 19:31
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 1990 19:31
47 lines
2941 bytes
2941 bytes
In article <1990Aug2.081407.10398@Solbourne.COM> imp@dancer.Solbourne.COM (Warner Losh) writes: >butcher@g.gp.cs.cmu.edu (Lawrence Butcher) writes: > >>There is no written law which says that a person is allowed to write a >>cross-compiler for Lotus Macros. > >In the abscense of a law, wouldn't the First Amendment have sway? >After all, freedom of speech isn't limited to the spoken word, or to >the English langauge. > >-- >Warner Losh imp@Solbourne.COM Actually free speech may be more limited than you think, expecially over electronic media. As I understand it communication over electronic media may be regulated to a certain extent by the FCC under extensions of the laws that were first applied to limited-capacity networks and broadcast media (e.g. telephone and radio). The impact seems to be not so much that someone can censor your messages but that your access to the networks is not a guaranteed right as your access to a public sidewalk is (barring public curfew, etc.). Consider how communication on the InterNet is supposed to be confined to NON-COMMERCIAL messages (except of course in foo.forsale...). In general electronic media (new forms and technologies for television, computers and computer networks and by extension simple disks) pose a new challenge to the American court system which has an unfortunate tendency to try to pigeonhole new technologies into "extensions" of older ones, whether or not it makes any sense. Hence the current problems with software copyright and patent -- too much legal interpretation hinges on the LETTER of the law rather than on the stated INTENT of the law. But enough of my jabber. Any more informed personages care to comment? --Mike-- P.S. -- Does anyone in Congress know about LPF? If not, *WHY* *NOT* ? ____Mike_Zraly____________________________________________________________ | obligatory address : c/o seaotter@athena.mit.edu | | obligatory disclaimer : My views don't represent anyone but me | | obligatory quote : Nothing takes the taste out of peanut | | butter quite like unrequited love. | | -- Charlie Brown | :________________________________________________________________________:
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Aug2.193105.6081@athena.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!umich!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!seaotterReferences:
<10063@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <rodney.649520609@ipl.rpi.edu> <1990Aug2.081407.10398@Solbourne.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,69b36400835d49c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-08-02 12:31:05 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!samsung!umich!yale!mintaka!bloom-beacon!seaotter From: seaotter@athena.mit.edu (Stacy L Ramirez) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: look-n-feel: cost without benefit Message-ID: <1990Aug2.193105.6081@athena.mit.edu> Date: 2 Aug 90 19:31:05 GMT References: <10063@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <rodney.649520609@ipl.rpi.edu> <1990Aug2.081407.10398@Solbourne.COM> Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background) Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 47 Posted: Thu Aug 2 20:31:05 1990