Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75475Re: Copyrights
From: Ted Dunning
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 1990 23:17
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 1990 23:17
52 lines
2923 bytes
2923 bytes
In article <rodney.649107377@dali.ipl.rpi.edu> rodney@ipl.rpi.edu (Rodney Peck II) writes: What about the RSA patent? It covers the RSA public key encryption algorithm. actually, what is patented is the use of RSA to build a public key communications device. obviously using a general purpose computer is one way to build such a device, but so is using dedicated hardware. I was going to use it in a piece of software, but it turns out that it is covered by a patent and usage requires licensing from the patent holders. read the patent to find out exactly what is covered. remember that it is only patented in the us because of prior publication. I find it pretty amazing that the idea of making a ring from the product of two really big prime numbers and then doing some straightforward modulo arithmetic on it is patentable. it isn't. I would possibly understand if there were restritions on someone's really fast implementation of it, that wouldn't be patentable either. it would probably be thcopyrightable. but this is, in my understanding, a patent taht covers any usage of anything that uses this RSA idea. it isn't. just something that uses it for communicating data and whatever else is claimed in the patent is protected. and even then, you might be able to argue that there is a defect in the patent, either in its execution, or in the fact that it was granted at all. The best part is that all of the crypto books I have read refer to RSA and the knapsack algs and point out that knapsack has been broken and that RSA is the only known secure public alg. Terrific. read sci.crypt for a while for a better (and more accurate version) of the facts. the world isn't that simple. only super increasing knap-sacks are known to be easy to break. of course, there is some general distrust of knapsacks in general. look up exponential key exchange for another option. better yet, if this really bothers you, invent a better system and leave it free. -- Offer void except where prohibited by law.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<TED.90Jul27171727@kythera.nmsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!shelby!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!nmsu!opus!tedReferences:
<78670@aerospace.AERO.ORG> <1990Jul27.014947.19528@hellgate.utah.edu> <MERNST.90Jul27145740@emu.lcs.mit.edu> <rodney.649107377@dali.ipl.rpi.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,a3783b857baac617 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-07-27 16:17:27 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!shelby!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!nmsu!opus!ted From: ted@nmsu.edu (Ted Dunning) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Copyrights Message-ID: <TED.90Jul27171727@kythera.nmsu.edu> Date: 27 Jul 90 23:17:27 GMT References: <78670@aerospace.AERO.ORG> <1990Jul27.014947.19528@hellgate.utah.edu> <MERNST.90Jul27145740@emu.lcs.mit.edu> <rodney.649107377@dali.ipl.rpi.edu> Sender: news@NMSU.edu Organization: NMSU Computer Science Lines: 52 Posted: Sat Jul 28 00:17:27 1990 In-reply-to: rodney@ipl.rpi.edu's message of 27 Jul 90 19:40:24 GMT