LPF

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #75515

#75515

From: Dale R. Worley
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 1990 01:24

8 lines
961 bytes

Has the LPF considered a lobbying campaign?  In principle, the
boundaries of what is copyrightable and what is not are supposed to be
determined by the statutes, not the courts, and Congress would be a
much better forum for discussing the pros and cons of user interface
copyright than a court case that was wrapped up in the details of some
particular case.

Dale

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DRW.90Jul22212457@zermelo.mit.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!math.mit.edu!drw

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,4aad2134a4b765b7,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-07-22 22:49:33 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!math.mit.edu!drw
From: drw@zermelo.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: LPF
Message-ID: <DRW.90Jul22212457@zermelo.mit.edu>
Date: 23 Jul 90 01:24:57 GMT
Sender: daemon@athena.mit.edu (Mr Background)
Distribution: gnu
Organization: MIT Dept. of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA, USA
Lines: 8
Posted: Mon Jul 23 02:24:57 1990