Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #75655Re: Sun moving to Sys V
From: Bob Sutterfield
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 1990 21:13
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 1990 21:13
16 lines
1683 bytes
1683 bytes
In article <8606@goofy.Apple.COM> escher@Apple.COM (Michael Crawford) writes: [...lots of Sun- and SunOS-specific questions elided, since they should be on comp.sys.sun/sun-spots anyway ...] Not that I like System 5 -- but a useful strategy may be to provide a "compatibility mode", like Sun does presently (/usr/5bin/cc compiles using the System 5 system call semantics, etc.) It looks now like GNU will be Mach. Since "UNIX" is only (to the Mach kernel's point of view) a user-level process that coincidentally happens to emulate 4.3BSD to other user level processes, there's nothing to prevent someone from writing a SVID3- or FIPS- or Posix- or VMS- or Whatever-compliant emulator as well. Are you volunteering? Didn't I hear somewhere that OSF or perhaps Microsoft was doing an OS/2 emulator for Mach? Or was that rumor as stillborn as OS/2? :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BOB.90Jun7171345@volitans.MorningStar.Com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bobReferences:
<DRW.90Jun6203327@zermelo.mit.edu> <8606@goofy.Apple.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5647d25af7afa4a1 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-06-07 18:26:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Sun moving to Sys V Message-ID: <BOB.90Jun7171345@volitans.MorningStar.Com> Date: 7 Jun 90 21:13:54 GMT References: <DRW.90Jun6203327@zermelo.mit.edu> <8606@goofy.Apple.COM> Sender: news@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Distribution: gnu Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 16 Posted: Thu Jun 7 22:13:54 1990 In-Reply-To: escher@Apple.COM's message of 7 Jun 90 18:00:54 GMT